• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双等位基因单倍型和基因型频率对基因分型错误的敏感性。

Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.

作者信息

Moskvina Valentina, Schmidt Karl Michael

机构信息

Bioinformatics and Biostatistics Unit, Wales College of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4XN, UK.

出版信息

Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1116-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00563.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00563.x
PMID:17156286
Abstract

With the availability of fast genotyping methods and genomic databases, the search for statistical association of single nucleotide polymorphisms with a complex trait has become an important methodology in medical genetics. However, even fairly rare errors occurring during the genotyping process can lead to spurious association results and decrease in statistical power. We develop a systematic approach to study how genotyping errors change the genotype distribution in a sample. The general M-marker case is reduced to that of a single-marker locus by recognizing the underlying tensor-product structure of the error matrix. Both method and general conclusions apply to the general error model; we give detailed results for allele-based errors of size depending both on the marker locus and the allele present. Multiple errors are treated in terms of the associated diffusion process on the space of genotype distributions. We find that certain genotype and haplotype distributions remain unchanged under genotyping errors, and that genotyping errors generally render the distribution more similar to the stable one. In case-control association studies, this will lead to loss of statistical power for nondifferential genotyping errors and increase in type I error for differential genotyping errors. Moreover, we show that allele-based genotyping errors do not disturb Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium in the genotype distribution. In this setting we also identify maximally affected distributions. As they correspond to situations with rare alleles and marker loci in high linkage disequilibrium, careful checking for genotyping errors is advisable when significant association based on such alleles/haplotypes is observed in association studies.

摘要

随着快速基因分型方法和基因组数据库的出现,寻找单核苷酸多态性与复杂性状之间的统计关联已成为医学遗传学中的一种重要方法。然而,即使在基因分型过程中出现相当罕见的错误也可能导致虚假的关联结果,并降低统计效力。我们开发了一种系统方法来研究基因分型错误如何改变样本中的基因型分布。通过识别误差矩阵潜在的张量积结构,将一般的M标记情况简化为单标记位点的情况。该方法和一般结论都适用于一般误差模型;我们给出了基于等位基因的错误大小的详细结果,该错误大小取决于标记位点和所存在的等位基因。根据基因型分布空间上的相关扩散过程来处理多个错误。我们发现某些基因型和单倍型分布在基因分型错误下保持不变,并且基因分型错误通常会使分布更类似于稳定分布。在病例对照关联研究中,这将导致非差异基因分型错误的统计效力丧失,以及差异基因分型错误的I型错误增加。此外,我们表明基于等位基因的基因分型错误不会干扰基因型分布中的哈迪-温伯格平衡。在这种情况下,我们还确定了受影响最大的分布。由于它们对应于罕见等位基因和处于高连锁不平衡状态的标记位点的情况,因此当在关联研究中观察到基于此类等位基因/单倍型的显著关联时,建议仔细检查基因分型错误。

相似文献

1
Susceptibility of biallelic haplotype and genotype frequencies to genotyping error.双等位基因单倍型和基因型频率对基因分型错误的敏感性。
Biometrics. 2006 Dec;62(4):1116-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00563.x.
2
Detailed analysis of the relative power of direct and indirect association studies and the implications for their interpretation.直接关联研究与间接关联研究相对效力的详细分析及其解读的意义。
Hum Hered. 2007;64(1):63-73. doi: 10.1159/000101424. Epub 2007 Apr 27.
3
Quantifying bias due to allele misclassification in case-control studies of haplotypes.在单倍型病例对照研究中,对由于等位基因错误分类导致的偏倚进行量化。
Genet Epidemiol. 2006 Nov;30(7):590-601. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20170.
4
Testing for association with a case-parents design in the presence of genotyping errors.在存在基因分型错误的情况下,采用病例-父母设计进行关联性检验。
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;26(2):142-54. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10297.
5
Quantifying the amount of missing information in genetic association studies.量化基因关联研究中缺失信息的数量。
Genet Epidemiol. 2006 Dec;30(8):703-17. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20181.
6
Haplotype sharing transmission/disequilibrium tests that allow for genotyping errors.允许存在基因分型错误的单倍型共享传递/不平衡检验。
Genet Epidemiol. 2005 May;28(4):341-51. doi: 10.1002/gepi.20066.
7
What SNP genotyping errors are most costly for genetic association studies?对于基因关联研究而言,哪些单核苷酸多态性(SNP)基因分型错误代价最为高昂?
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;26(2):132-41. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10301.
8
Identification of probable genotyping errors by consideration of haplotypes.通过考虑单倍型来识别可能的基因分型错误。
Eur J Hum Genet. 2006 Apr;14(4):450-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201565.
9
[How about the uncertainty in the haplotypes in the population-based KORA studies?].基于人群的KORA研究中,单倍型的不确定性情况如何?
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Aug;67 Suppl 1:S132-6. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-858253.
10
Power of direct vs. indirect haplotyping in association studies.关联研究中直接与间接单倍型分型的效能
Genet Epidemiol. 2004 Feb;26(2):116-24. doi: 10.1002/gepi.10300.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic variation in neuregulin1 is associated with differences in prefrontal engagement in children.神经调节蛋白 1 的遗传变异与儿童前额叶参与的差异有关。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009 Dec;30(12):3934-43. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20818.
2
Dysbindin gene (DTNBP1) and schizophrenia in Korean population.韩国人群中的失调结合蛋白基因(DTNBP1)与精神分裂症
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2009 Apr;259(3):137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00406-008-0830-y. Epub 2009 Feb 28.
3
Impact of genotyping errors on the type I error rate and the power of haplotype-based association methods.
基因分型错误对I型错误率及基于单倍型的关联分析方法效能的影响。
BMC Genet. 2009 Jan 29;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1471-2156-10-3.
4
Estimating the single nucleotide polymorphism genotype misclassification from routine double measurements in a large epidemiologic sample.从大型流行病学样本中的常规双份测量估计单核苷酸多态性基因型错误分类
Am J Epidemiol. 2008 Oct 15;168(8):878-89. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwn208. Epub 2008 Sep 12.