Suppr超能文献

SETOC工具的验证——门诊教学学生评价

Validation of the SETOC instrument -- Student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics.

作者信息

Zuberi Rukhsana W, Bordage Georges, Norman Geoffrey R

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, PO Box 3500, 74800, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Feb;12(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-2328-y. Epub 2006 Dec 8.

Abstract

PURPOSE

There is a paucity of evaluation forms specifically developed and validated for outpatient settings. The purpose of this study was to develop and validate an instrument specifically for evaluating outpatient teaching, to provide reliable and valid ratings for individual and group feedback to faculty, and to identify outstanding teachers in that setting.

METHOD

By literature reviews and pilot studies at the Faculties of Health Sciences, McMaster University (Canada) and Aga Khan University (AKU-Pakistan), a 15-item instrument, Student Evaluation of Teaching in Outpatient Clinics (SETOC), was created with five subscales: "Establishing Learning-Milieu, Clinical-Teaching, General-Teaching, Clinical-Competence, and Global-Rating." Seven-point Likert-type rating scales were used. Students also nominated three "best" outpatient teachers.

PARTICIPANTS

87 faculty members (79%) rated by all 224 third to fifth-year students (clerks) at outpatient departments of the AKU hospital over a one-year period.

ANALYSES

Repeated measures generalizability studies, correlations, concurrent validity of SETOC scores with best teacher nominations.

RESULTS

Inter-rater G-coefficient and internal consistency of SETOC student ratings were 0.92 and 0.98. Average inter-item and inter-subscale correlations were 0.79 and 0.86. Comparing SETOC scores against "Best Teacher" nominations, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values were greater than 0.84. Student ratings ranged from unsatisfactory (fourteen instructors) to outstanding (four instructors). Mean-scores for Learning-Milieu, Clinical-Teaching and General-Teaching were lower than those for Clinical-Competence and Global-Rating (p=0.000 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

The SETOC elicited reliable and valid student ratings that can provide specific feedback to individual faculty with weak or outstanding teaching skills, and identify overall group shortcomings for faculty development.

摘要

目的

专门为门诊环境开发并验证的评估表较为匮乏。本研究的目的是开发并验证一种专门用于评估门诊教学的工具,为向教师提供个人和小组反馈提供可靠且有效的评分,并在该环境中识别优秀教师。

方法

通过在加拿大麦克马斯特大学健康科学学院和巴基斯坦阿迦汗大学进行文献综述和试点研究,创建了一个包含15个条目的工具——门诊诊所教学学生评价(SETOC),有五个子量表:“建立学习环境、临床教学、一般教学、临床能力和总体评分”。使用了七点李克特式评分量表。学生们还提名了三位“最佳”门诊教师。

参与者

在一年时间里,阿迦汗大学医院门诊部门的所有224名三至五年级学生(实习生)对87名教师(79%)进行了评分。

分析

重复测量概化性研究、相关性分析、SETOC分数与最佳教师提名的同时效度分析。

结果

SETOC学生评分的评分者间G系数和内部一致性分别为0.92和0.98。平均项目间和子量表间的相关性分别为0.79和0.86。将SETOC分数与“最佳教师”提名进行比较,敏感性、特异性、阳性和阴性预测值均大于0.84。学生评分从不满意(14名教师)到优秀(4名教师)不等。学习环境、临床教学和一般教学的平均分数低于临床能力和总体评分(所有p值均为0.000)。

结论

SETOC获得了可靠且有效的学生评分,可为教学技能薄弱或优秀的教师提供具体反馈,并识别教师发展中的整体群体不足。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验