• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

外科教员及外科本科教学评估

Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.

作者信息

Postuma R

出版信息

Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):351-4.

PMID:4016610
Abstract

Surgical teachers are interested in being evaluated. In a survey of 89 such teachers at the University of Manitoba, most (79%) preferred having their undergraduate teaching evaluated by their students to other methods of evaluation. Eighty-seven percent of North American departments of surgery had a mechanism for assessing the quality of undergraduate teaching; 97% used student feedback. In order for the evaluation to be effective in improving undergraduate teaching, there must be serious faculty commitment, the teachers must know the criteria for evaluation, and feedback to the teachers should be early and preferably coupled with teacher self-assessment. This paper lists criteria for the evaluation of surgical undergraduate teachers and outlines the evaluation instrument currently used in the Department of Surgery at the University of Manitoba.

摘要

外科教师对接受评估很感兴趣。在对曼尼托巴大学89位此类教师进行的一项调查中,大多数(79%)教师更倾向于让学生对其本科教学进行评估,而非其他评估方式。北美87%的外科系设有评估本科教学质量的机制;97%采用学生反馈。为使评估能有效改进本科教学,教师必须认真投入,教师必须了解评估标准,并且应尽早向教师反馈,最好与教师自我评估相结合。本文列出了评估外科本科教师的标准,并概述了曼尼托巴大学外科系目前使用的评估工具。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of surgical faculty and surgical undergraduate teaching.外科教员及外科本科教学评估
Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):351-4.
2
Medical student evaluation of faculty in student-preceptor pairs.医学生对师生配对中带教教师的评价。
Acad Med. 2007 Oct;82(10 Suppl):S30-3. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318141f575.
3
Evaluating the quality of teaching in medical education: are we using the evidence for both formative and summative purposes?评估医学教育中的教学质量:我们是否将证据用于形成性和总结性目的?
Med Teach. 2002 May;24(3):313-9. doi: 10.1080/01421590220134169.
4
Investigating the use of sampling for maximising the efficiency of student-generated faculty teaching evaluations.研究如何利用抽样来最大化学生生成的教师教学评价的效率。
Med Educ. 2005 Feb;39(2):171-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02066.x.
5
Validation of the SETOC instrument -- Student evaluation of teaching in outpatient clinics.SETOC工具的验证——门诊教学学生评价
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2007 Feb;12(1):55-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-2328-y. Epub 2006 Dec 8.
6
Steps to improve the teaching of public health to undergraduate medical students in Canada.加拿大提高本科医学生公共卫生教学质量的步骤。
Acad Med. 2008 Apr;83(4):414-8. doi: 10.1097/ACM.0b013e318166a8e4.
7
Evaluation matters: lessons learned on the evaluation of surgical teaching.评估至关重要:外科教学评估的经验教训。
Surgeon. 2011;9 Suppl 1:S43-4. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2010.11.016. Epub 2011 Feb 18.
8
["Practical clinical competence" - a joint programme to improve training in surgery].["实践临床能力"——一项改善外科培训的联合计划]
Zentralbl Chir. 2013 Dec;138(6):663-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1328180. Epub 2013 Apr 10.
9
Medical student evaluation of teaching quality between obstetrics and gynecology residents and faculty as clinical preceptors in ambulatory gynecology.医学生对妇产科住院医师和教员作为门诊妇科临床带教老师的教学质量评价
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Nov;195(5):1479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2006.05.038. Epub 2006 Jul 26.
10
Organization of the department of surgery to facilitate undergraduate education.外科系的组织架构以促进本科教育。
Can J Surg. 1985 Jul;28(4):349-51.