Suppr超能文献

多西环素与头孢曲松治疗慢性莱姆病患者的对比研究

Doxycycline versus ceftriaxone for the treatment of patients with chronic Lyme borreliosis.

作者信息

Ogrinc Katarina, Logar Mateja, Lotric-Furlan Stanka, Cerar Dasa, Ruzić-Sabljić Eva, Strle Franc

机构信息

Department of Infectious Diseases, University Medical Center Ljubljana, Slovenia.

出版信息

Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2006 Nov;118(21-22):696-701. doi: 10.1007/s00508-006-0698-7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic guidelines for treatment of late manifestations of Lyme borreliosis have not yet become well established. Patients with symptoms suggesting central nervous system involvement are often treated with courses of intravenous ceftriaxone. This is an expensive treatment approach with potentially severe side effects. We compared the efficacy, side effects and costs of doxycycline and ceftriaxone in the treatment of such patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Adult patients qualified for the study if they had nonspecific symptoms suggesting central nervous system involvement for more than six months (but without overt clinical signs of the involvement), had positive serum borrelial antibody titers and/or erythema migrans prior to the onset of symptoms, had not been previously treated with antibiotics and did not have pleocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid. Patients were given either 100 mg of oral doxycycline twice daily for 4 weeks (23 patients) or 2 g of intravenous ceftriaxone daily for 2 weeks followed by 100 mg of doxycycline twice daily for another 2 weeks (23 patients). Clinical outcome was assessed during a 12-month follow-up period.

RESULTS

Improvement in the frequency and/or the intensity of symptoms was reported by more than two-thirds of the 46 patients enrolled in the study. The two treatment regimens were found to be correspondingly effective. Photosensitivity reactions and gastrointestinal symptoms were noted more often among patients receiving doxycycline than in those receiving ceftriaxone. Treatment with doxycycline proved to be much cheaper than with ceftriaxone.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with previously untreated chronic Lyme borreliosis with symptoms suggesting central nervous system involvement but without overt clinical signs of it, and without pleocytosis in the cerebrospinal fluid, treatment with doxycycline is as effective as with ceftriaxone. Treatment with doxycycline is cheap and relatively safe, but gastrointestinal symptoms and photosensitivity reactions can be expected more often than with ceftriaxone.

摘要

背景

莱姆病疏螺旋体病晚期表现的治疗指南尚未完全确立。有中枢神经系统受累症状的患者通常接受静脉注射头孢曲松的疗程治疗。这是一种昂贵的治疗方法,且可能有严重的副作用。我们比较了多西环素和头孢曲松在治疗此类患者中的疗效、副作用和成本。

患者与方法

符合研究条件的成年患者需满足以下条件:有提示中枢神经系统受累的非特异性症状超过6个月(但无明显临床受累体征),症状出现前血清疏螺旋体抗体滴度呈阳性和/或有游走性红斑,此前未接受过抗生素治疗,且脑脊液中无细胞数增多。患者被给予以下两种治疗方案之一:23例患者每日口服100mg多西环素,分两次服用,共4周;23例患者每日静脉注射2g头孢曲松,共2周,随后每日口服100mg多西环素,分两次服用,再持续2周。在12个月的随访期内评估临床结果。

结果

在纳入研究的46例患者中,超过三分之二的患者报告症状频率和/或强度有所改善。发现两种治疗方案效果相当。接受多西环素治疗的患者比接受头孢曲松治疗的患者更常出现光敏反应和胃肠道症状。事实证明,多西环素治疗比头孢曲松治疗便宜得多。

结论

对于先前未经治疗的慢性莱姆病疏螺旋体病患者,有提示中枢神经系统受累但无明显临床体征且脑脊液中无细胞数增多的情况,多西环素治疗与头孢曲松治疗效果相同。多西环素治疗便宜且相对安全,但与头孢曲松相比,胃肠道症状和光敏反应的出现频率可能更高。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验