Arts Josje H E, Kuper C Frieke
TNO Quality of Life, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, P.O.Box 360, 3700 AJ Zeist, The Netherlands.
Methods. 2007 Jan;41(1):61-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2006.07.005.
At present, there are no widely applied or fully validated test methods to identify respiratory LMW allergens, i.e. compounds that are considered capable of inducing allergic asthma. Most tests have been investigated using strong respiratory allergens. Moreover, they are meant to detect the potential of a chemical to induce respiratory sensitisation at relatively high doses. Consequently, the sensitivity of the tests is not well-known, and they do not provide information on low doses such as generally found in occupational situations, and on threshold levels to be used in risk assessment. In addition, the various test methods use different application routes, i.e. intradermal, topical or inhalation exposure, and different parameters. Therefore standardised and validated dose-response test methods are urgently required in order to be able to identify respiratory allergens and to recommend safe exposure levels for consumers and workers. In the present paper, methods or testing strategies are described to detect respiratory sensitisation and/or allergy. Overall, assays that utilize only an induction phase may serve as indicators of respiratory sensitisation potential whereas assays that use both an induction and an elicitation or challenge phase may provide information on potency and presence of thresholds. The dermal route as sensitisation route has the advantage of the respiratory tract not being exposed to the allergen prior to challenge which facilitates the distinction between irritant and allergic effects.
目前,尚无广泛应用或充分验证的用于鉴定呼吸道低分子量过敏原(即被认为能够诱发过敏性哮喘的化合物)的测试方法。大多数测试都是使用强效呼吸道过敏原进行研究的。此外,这些测试旨在检测化学品在相对高剂量下诱发呼吸道致敏的可能性。因此,这些测试的灵敏度尚不清楚,而且它们无法提供有关职业环境中常见的低剂量以及风险评估中使用的阈值水平的信息。此外,各种测试方法使用不同的应用途径,即皮内、局部或吸入暴露,以及不同的参数。因此,迫切需要标准化和经过验证的剂量反应测试方法,以便能够识别呼吸道过敏原并为消费者和工人推荐安全暴露水平。在本文中,描述了检测呼吸道致敏和/或过敏的方法或测试策略。总体而言,仅利用诱导阶段的试验可作为呼吸道致敏潜力的指标,而同时使用诱导阶段和激发或挑战阶段的试验可提供有关效力和阈值存在情况的信息。以皮肤途径作为致敏途径的优点是,在激发之前呼吸道不会接触过敏原,这便于区分刺激作用和过敏作用。