Olmsted Russell N, Kowalski Christine P, Krein Sarah L, Saint Sanjay
Infection Control Services, Saint Joseph Mercy Health System, 5301 E. Huron River Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48106, USA.
Am J Infect Control. 2006 Dec;34(10):616-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2006.05.294.
Because evidence-based health care is taking on increasing importance, we surveyed a national sample of infection control coordinators on their reading habits to discern which and how often various media are utilized.
Infection control coordinators at 797 hospitals in the United States were mailed a survey asking which peer-reviewed journals and other publications they subscribe to, their perception of the quality of the infection control articles provided by each, and the extent to which they use various resources for their work.
The survey response rate was 74%. Infection control coordinators spend a mean of 3.6 hours/week reading journals or periodicals. Resources identified as most useful included the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) Web site (52%), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. (APIC) text (11%), and the APIC e-mail list (8%). Proportion of subscribers was highest for the American Journal of Infection Control (84%) and Infection Control Today (72%). The top 3 journals ranked on a scale of 1 to 10 for quality of infection control articles were Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (8.0), the American Journal of Infection Control (7.5), and the New England Journal of Medicine (7.4). The American Journal of Infection Control (85%) and Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology (72%) were the most frequently used peer-reviewed sources of information, whereas Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (85%) and Hospital Infection Control (63%) ranked at the top for non-peer-reviewed periodicals.
Infection control coordinators devote limited time to reading and critically appraising published evidence and rely heavily on sources that provide rapid access to information or evidence summaries, suggesting a growing need for easy-to-read, reliable sources of information about evidence-based infection prevention and control practices.
鉴于循证医疗保健的重要性日益增加,我们对全国范围内的感染控制协调员的阅读习惯进行了调查,以了解他们使用各种媒体的情况及频率。
我们向美国797家医院的感染控制协调员邮寄了一份调查问卷,询问他们订阅了哪些同行评审期刊和其他出版物,他们对每种出版物所提供的感染控制文章质量的看法,以及他们在工作中使用各种资源的程度。
调查回复率为74%。感染控制协调员平均每周花3.6小时阅读期刊或杂志。被认为最有用的资源包括疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)网站(52%)、感染控制与流行病学专业人员协会(APIC)的文本(11%)以及APIC电子邮件列表(8%)。《美国感染控制杂志》(84%)和《今日感染控制》(72%)的订阅比例最高。在感染控制文章质量从1到10的评分中,排名前三的期刊分别是《感染控制与医院流行病学》(8.0)、《美国感染控制杂志》(7.5)和《新英格兰医学杂志》(7.4)。《美国感染控制杂志》(85%)和《感染控制与医院流行病学》(72%)是最常被使用的同行评审信息来源,而《发病率与死亡率周报》(85%)和《医院感染控制》(63%)在非同行评审期刊中排名靠前。
感染控制协调员用于阅读和批判性评估已发表证据的时间有限,并且严重依赖能够快速获取信息或证据摘要的来源,这表明越来越需要关于循证感染预防和控制实践的易读、可靠的信息来源。