• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

MACOP-B方案与F-MACHOP方案治疗高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较

MACOP-B vs F-MACHOP in the treatment of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.

作者信息

Tura S, Mandelli F, Mazza P, Pileri S, Gherlinzoni F, Bocchia M, Zinzani P L, Fiacchini M, Martelli M, Papa G

机构信息

Istituto di Ematologia L. e A. Seràgnoli, Università di Bologna, Italy.

出版信息

Leukemia. 1991;5 Suppl 1:74-8.

PMID:1716338
Abstract

From September 1988 two hundred-sixty-seven (267) untreated patients (pts) with stage II to IV high grade non Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) have been enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, still ongoing study, comparing two third-generation combination chemotherapy regimens, MACOP-B versus F-MACHOP. At the present time, 177 pts have completed the treatment program and are evaluable, with a median follow-up of 13 months. Clinical, histologic and laboratory characteristics are equally distributed in both groups. Among the 92 pts treated with MACOP-B, 58 (63%) achieved a complete remission (CR), 17 complete responders have relapsed (29%), and 21 have died (23%), including 3 treatment-related deaths. Among the 85 pts who received F-MACHOP, 65 (76%) achieved a CR, 9 complete responders have relapsed (14%), and 11 pts have died (13%), including 3 treatment related deaths. 30 months-projected survival is 64% for MACOP-B treated pts compared to 84% for F-MACHOP treated pts; 30 months-projected relapse- free survival is 80% and 84%, respectively. F-MACHOP seems to be superior in immunoblastic lymphoma (overall survival, OS, 82% vs. 54%) and in Burkitt-type lymphoblastic lymphoma (OS 100% vs, 42%). The degree of hematological and non-hematological toxicity was similar in both regimens. More reliable conclusions will be drawn after a longer follow-up.

摘要

自1988年9月起,267例未经治疗的II至IV期高级别非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者被纳入一项多中心、随机且仍在进行的研究,比较两种第三代联合化疗方案,即MACOP-B方案与F-MACHOP方案。目前,177例患者已完成治疗方案且可进行评估,中位随访时间为13个月。两组患者的临床、组织学和实验室特征分布均衡。在接受MACOP-B方案治疗的92例患者中,58例(63%)实现完全缓解(CR),17例完全缓解者复发(29%),21例死亡(23%),其中包括3例与治疗相关的死亡。在接受F-MACHOP方案治疗的85例患者中,65例(76%)实现CR,9例完全缓解者复发(14%),11例患者死亡(13%),其中包括3例与治疗相关的死亡。MACOP-B方案治疗患者的30个月预计生存率为64%,而F-MACHOP方案治疗患者为84%;30个月预计无复发生存率分别为80%和84%。F-MACHOP方案在免疫母细胞淋巴瘤(总生存期,OS,82%对54%)和伯基特型淋巴细胞淋巴瘤(OS 100%对42%)方面似乎更具优势。两种方案的血液学和非血液学毒性程度相似。更长时间的随访后将得出更可靠的结论。

相似文献

1
MACOP-B vs F-MACHOP in the treatment of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.MACOP-B方案与F-MACHOP方案治疗高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较
Leukemia. 1991;5 Suppl 1:74-8.
2
How do patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma treated with third-generation regimens (MACOP-B and F-MACHOP) fare in the long-term?采用第三代治疗方案(MACOP-B和F-MACHOP)治疗的侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者的长期预后如何?
Haematologica. 1999 Nov;84(11):996-1001.
3
MACOP-B vs F-MACHOP regimen in the treatment of high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas.MACOP-B方案与F-MACHOP方案治疗高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤的疗效比较
Leuk Lymphoma. 1995 Feb;16(5-6):457-63. doi: 10.3109/10428199509054434.
4
ProMACE-MOPP vs MACOP-B in high grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a randomised study in a multicenter cooperative study group (NHLCSG).
Leukemia. 1991;5 Suppl 1:107-11.
5
Comparison of a standard regimen (CHOP) with three intensive chemotherapy regimens for advanced non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.标准方案(CHOP)与三种强化化疗方案治疗晚期非霍奇金淋巴瘤的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1993 Apr 8;328(14):1002-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199304083281404.
6
MACOP-B treatment for intermediate and high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphomas at diagnosis and in relapse.MACOP-B方案用于中高度恶性非霍奇金淋巴瘤初治及复发时的治疗。
Haematologica. 1990 Mar-Apr;75(2):149-54.
7
The F-MACHOP regimen in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphomas: a single center experience in 72 patients.
Haematologica. 1996 Nov-Dec;81(6):521-8.
8
[Treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with the ProMACE- CytaBOM protocol].采用ProMACE-CytaBOM方案治疗侵袭性非霍奇金淋巴瘤
Srp Arh Celok Lek. 1998 Sep-Oct;126(9-10):345-8.
9
MACOP-B versus ProMACE-MOPP in the treatment of advanced diffuse non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: results of a prospective randomized trial by the non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Cooperative Study Group.MACOP-B方案与ProMACE-MOPP方案治疗晚期弥漫性非霍奇金淋巴瘤:非霍奇金淋巴瘤协作研究组前瞻性随机试验结果
J Clin Oncol. 1994 Jul;12(7):1366-74. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.7.1366.
10
A variant of ProMACE-CytaBOM chemotherapy for non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with threefold higher drug dose size but identical cumulative dose intensity. A pilot study of the Italian lymphoma study group (GISL).一种用于非霍奇金淋巴瘤的ProMACE-CytaBOM化疗方案变体,药物剂量大小提高了三倍,但累积剂量强度相同。意大利淋巴瘤研究组(GISL)的一项试点研究。
Haematologica. 2000 Mar;85(3):263-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Synchronous rectal adenocarcinoma and splenic marginal zone lymphoma.同步性直肠腺癌和脾边缘区淋巴瘤。
Curr Oncol. 2016 Feb;23(1):e70-4. doi: 10.3747/co.23.2711. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
2
Therapeutic interventions for Burkitt lymphoma in children.儿童伯基特淋巴瘤的治疗干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Jul 6;2011(7):CD005198. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005198.pub3.
3
Long-term follow-up after curative surgery for early gastric lymphoma.早期胃淋巴瘤根治性手术后的长期随访
Ann Surg. 1996 Jan;223(1):53-62. doi: 10.1097/00000658-199601000-00008.