• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种不同修复设计的下颌种植体支持覆盖义齿:维护干预的回顾性初步研究

Mandibular implant-retained overdentures with 2 different prosthetic designs: a retrospective pilot study on maintenance interventions.

作者信息

Ceruti Paola, Menicucci Giulio, Schierano Gianmario, Mussano Federico, Preti Giulio

机构信息

Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, School of Dentistry, University of Torino, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):557-9.

PMID:17165293
Abstract

This retrospective study aimed to investigate whether a mandibular implant-retained overdenture designed to counteract the rotation of the denture might influence the clinical outcome, as evaluated through the prosthetic maintenance interventions. The amount of repairs and relines of the mandibular and maxillary dentures required in an experimental group (6 patients wearing an implant-retained overdenture with a metal frame counteracting the rotation) and a control group (6 patients wearing an implant-retained overdenture allowing the rotation) was compared. Both mandibular and maxillary dentures needed few repairs or relines. The 2 types of dentures showed a similar number of maintenance interventions.

摘要

这项回顾性研究旨在调查一种设计用于抵消义齿旋转的下颌种植体固位覆盖义齿是否会影响临床结果,该结果通过修复维护干预措施进行评估。比较了实验组(6名患者佩戴带有金属框架以抵消旋转的种植体固位覆盖义齿)和对照组(6名患者佩戴允许旋转的种植体固位覆盖义齿)下颌和上颌义齿所需的修复和重衬次数。下颌和上颌义齿都只需进行少量修复或重衬。两种类型的义齿显示出相似数量的维护干预措施。

相似文献

1
Mandibular implant-retained overdentures with 2 different prosthetic designs: a retrospective pilot study on maintenance interventions.两种不同修复设计的下颌种植体支持覆盖义齿:维护干预的回顾性初步研究
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 Nov-Dec;19(6):557-9.
2
Comparison of three-implant-supported fixed dentures and two-implant-retained overdentures in the edentulous mandible: a pilot study of treatment efficacy and patient satisfaction.三种种植体支持的固定义齿与两种种植体固位的覆盖义齿在下颌无牙颌中的疗效比较:一项治疗效果和患者满意度的初步研究。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011 Mar-Apr;26(2):415-26.
3
A randomized clinical trial comparing patient satisfaction and prosthetic outcomes with mandibular overdentures retained by one or two implants.一项比较使用一枚或两枚种植体固位的下颌覆盖义齿患者满意度和修复效果的随机临床试验。
Int J Prosthodont. 2009 Jul-Aug;22(4):331-9.
4
Mandibular overdentures: comparative evaluation of prosthodontic maintenance of three different implant systems during the first year of service.下颌覆盖义齿:三种不同种植系统在使用第一年期间的口腔修复维护的比较评估。
Int J Prosthodont. 2002 May-Jun;15(3):259-66.
5
Immediate loading of two implants with a mandibular implant-retained overdenture: a new treatment protocol.下颌种植体固位覆盖义齿即刻加载两颗种植体:一种新的治疗方案。
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2011 Dec;13(4):255-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2009.00210.x. Epub 2009 Aug 3.
6
Implant-retained mandibular overdentures versus conventional dentures: 10 years of care and aftercare.种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿与传统义齿:10年的护理及后续护理
Int J Prosthodont. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):271-8.
7
A clinical trial of patient satisfaction and prosthodontic needs with ball and bar attachments for implant-retained complete overdentures: three-year results.一项关于种植体支持的全口覆盖义齿使用球帽和杆卡式附着体的患者满意度及口腔修复需求的临床试验:三年结果
J Prosthet Dent. 2005 Jan;93(1):28-37. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2004.10.013.
8
Comparison of prefabricated and custom-made bars used for implant-retained mandibular complete overdentures.预制和定制的用于种植体支持下颌全口义齿的连接杆的比较。
Implant Dent. 2009 Dec;18(6):501-11. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e3181b4f857.
9
Mandibular implant overdentures followed for over 10 years: patient compliance and prosthetic maintenance.下颌种植覆盖义齿随访超过 10 年:患者依从性和修复体维护。
Int J Prosthodont. 2010 Mar-Apr;23(2):91-8.
10
Denture satisfaction in a comparative study of implant-retained mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical trial.种植体支持的下颌覆盖义齿对比研究中的义齿满意度:一项随机临床试验
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):194-200.