Geertman M E, van Waas M A, van 't Hof M A, Kalk W
Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1996 Mar-Apr;11(2):194-200.
This study compared the experiences with surgical procedures and treatment effects of a mainly implant-supported overdenture retained by a transmandibular implant with those of an implant tissue-supported overdenture retained by two cylindrical endosseous implants. Treatment had been assigned according to a balanced allocation method to 95 patients, including a control group who received only conventional complete dentures. Since some of the patients refused the allocated treatment, the "intention to treat" analysis was applied. The results show that the experiences with surgical procedures were significantly more positive for the transmandibular implant group than the endosseous implant group. The differences with respect to satisfaction, complaints, and subjective chewing ability were not statistically significant. These results were unexpected because the overdentures retained by the transmandibular implants were, to a much larger extent, supported by the implant than were the overdentures retained by two endosseous implants.
本研究比较了经下颌种植体支持的主要为种植体固位覆盖义齿与两颗圆柱形骨内种植体支持的种植体组织固位覆盖义齿的手术体验和治疗效果。根据均衡分配方法将95例患者分配接受治疗,包括仅接受传统全口义齿的对照组。由于部分患者拒绝接受分配的治疗,因此采用“意向性分析”。结果显示,经下颌种植体组的手术体验明显优于骨内种植体组。在满意度、不适主诉和主观咀嚼能力方面的差异无统计学意义。这些结果出乎意料,因为经下颌种植体固位的覆盖义齿比两颗骨内种植体固位的覆盖义齿在更大程度上由种植体支持。