van Bokhoven Marloes A, Pleunis-van Empel Marjolein C H, Koch Hèlen, Grol Richard P T M, Dinant Geert-Jan, van der Weijden Trudy
University of Maastricht, Care and Public Health Research Institute, Department of General Practice/Centre for Quality of Care Research, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
BMC Fam Pract. 2006 Dec 13;7:75. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-7-75.
General practitioners often take their impression of patients' expectations into account in their decision to have blood tests done. It is commonly recommended to involve patients in decision-making during consultations. The study aimed to obtain detailed information on patients' expectations about blood tests.
Qualitative study among patients in waiting rooms of general practices. Each patient was presented with a short questionnaire about their preferences in terms of diagnostics. Patients who would like blood tests to be done were interviewed.
Fifty-seven (26%) of the 224 respondents wanted blood tests. Twenty-two were interviewed. Patients overestimated the qualities of blood tests. Favourable test results were regarded as proof of good health. Patients regarded blood tests as a useful instrument to screen for serious disorders, and were confirmed in this belief by people in their social environment and by the media. Many patients expected their GP to take an active test ordering approach, though some indicated that they might be convinced if their GP proposed a wait-and-see policy.
GPs' perceptions about patient expectations seem justified: patients appear to have high hopes for testing as a diagnostic tool. They expect diagnostic certainty without mistakes and a proof of good health. The question is whether it would be desirable to remove patients' misconceptions, allowing them to participate in policy decisions on the basis of sound information, or whether it would be better to leave the misconceptions uncontested, in order to retain the 'magic' of additional tests and reassure patients. We expect that clarifying the precise nature of patients' expectations by the GP may be helpful in creating a diagnostic strategy that satisfies both patients and GPs. GPs will have to balance the benefits of reassuring their patients by means of blood tests which may be unnecessary against the benefits of avoiding unnecessary tests. Further research is needed into the effects of different types of patient information and the effects of testing on satisfaction and anxiety.
全科医生在决定是否进行血液检查时,通常会考虑他们对患者期望的印象。通常建议在会诊期间让患者参与决策。该研究旨在获取有关患者对血液检查期望的详细信息。
在全科诊所候诊室的患者中进行定性研究。向每位患者发放一份简短的问卷,询问他们在诊断方面的偏好。对希望进行血液检查的患者进行访谈。
224名受访者中有57名(26%)希望进行血液检查。对其中22名进行了访谈。患者高估了血液检查的作用。良好的检查结果被视为健康状况良好的证明。患者将血液检查视为筛查严重疾病的有用手段,他们的社交圈子中的人和媒体也证实了这一观点。许多患者期望他们的全科医生采取积极的开单检查方式,不过也有一些患者表示,如果他们的全科医生提出观望政策,他们可能会被说服。
全科医生对患者期望的看法似乎是合理的:患者似乎对作为诊断工具的检查寄予厚望。他们期望诊断准确无误,并能得到健康状况良好的证明。问题是,是消除患者的误解,让他们在充分了解信息的基础上参与决策更好,还是任由误解存在,以保留额外检查的“魔力”并让患者安心更好。我们预计,全科医生明确患者期望的确切性质,可能有助于制定出令患者和全科医生都满意的诊断策略。全科医生将不得不权衡通过可能不必要的血液检查让患者安心的好处与避免不必要检查的好处。需要进一步研究不同类型的患者信息所产生的影响以及检查对满意度和焦虑的影响。