Huerta Timothy R, Casebeer Ann, Vanderplaat Madine
Child and Family Research Institute of British Columbia.
Healthc Pap. 2006;7(2):10-26. doi: 10.12927/hcpap..18551.
There is a growing need to better understand and address the consequences of an increasing reliance on networks used to enhance health services delivery. Networks seem to have emerged as the definitive solution for tackling complex healthcare problems together that we have not been able to adequately address separately. Emphasizing the collective and the collaborative, networks are assumed to address healthcare issues in ways that are superior to previous service-delivery models. While this assumption would appear to be sound theoretically, we have little empirical information available to actually understand what networks are, what they do and whether they achieve their stated goals--truly making a difference in the delivery of care and the maintenance of health. With a diversity of networks within Canada focused on health services delivery, this paper offers a multi-dimensional framework for conceptualizing how these complex inter-organizational relationships generate both challenges and opportunities. We identify six paradoxes that the networks create when used to enhance the delivery of health services and posit several propositions concerning the evaluative work that needs to be done to enhance our understanding of and confidence in this inter-organizational form. Unless these paradoxes are adequately recognized and addressed, the value and costs associated with developing and using networks in healthcare contexts will remain unclear at best. Given the broad interest in and use of networks proliferating in health-related arenas, it is time to amass the evidence and than align the perspectives. Are networks here to stay in healthcare because they make a difference or because we got tired of talking about the need for greater collaboration and so gave it a new name and frame? At the very least, it will be important to build on what we have already learned through research into collaboration in healthcare and related fields, and even more critical to be mindful of the pitfalls and possibilities of using networks as the solution of choice as we move forward.
人们越来越需要更好地理解并应对因越来越依赖用于改善医疗服务提供的网络而产生的后果。网络似乎已成为共同解决复杂医疗问题的最终解决方案,而这些问题我们此前一直无法单独充分解决。网络强调集体性和协作性,被认为能以优于以往服务提供模式的方式解决医疗问题。虽然这一假设在理论上似乎合理,但我们几乎没有实证信息来真正理解网络是什么、它们做什么以及是否实现了既定目标——即在医疗服务提供和健康维护方面真正产生影响。鉴于加拿大境内专注于医疗服务提供的网络多种多样,本文提供了一个多维度框架,用于概念化这些复杂的组织间关系如何既带来挑战又创造机遇。我们识别出了网络在用于改善医疗服务提供时产生的六个悖论,并提出了几个有关评估工作的命题,这些工作需要开展以增进我们对这种组织间形式的理解并增强信心。除非这些悖论得到充分认识和解决,否则在医疗环境中开发和使用网络所涉及的价值和成本充其量仍将不明朗。鉴于在与健康相关领域中对网络的广泛兴趣和使用不断增加,现在是时候积累证据并统一观点了。网络会在医疗领域持续存在是因为它们确实产生了影响,还是因为我们厌倦了谈论加强协作的必要性,所以给它换了个新名称和框架?至少,在我们已通过对医疗及相关领域协作的研究学到的知识基础上继续前进很重要,而在我们向前推进时,更加关键的是要留意将网络作为首选解决方案的陷阱和可能性。