Kolves Kairi, Sisask Merike, Anion Liivia, Samm Algi, Värnik Airi
Estonian-Swedish Mental Health and Suicidology Institute, Estonian Centre of Behavioral and Health Sciences, Tallinn, Estonia.
Croat Med J. 2006 Dec;47(6):869-77.
To explore differences between suicide victims among Russian immigrants in Estonia and native Estonians, according to socio-demographic background, substance use pattern, and recent life events to find out immigration-specific factors predicting suicide.
The psychological autopsy study included 427 people who committed suicide in 1999 and 427 randomly selected controls matched by region, gender, age, and nationality.
The only variable that differed significantly between Russian and Estonian suicide cases was substance use pattern. Logistic regression models showed that factors associated with suicide for both nationalities were substance dependence and abuse (Russians: odds ratio [OR], 12.9; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 4.2-39.2; Estonians: OR, 8.1; 95% CI, 3.9-16.4), economical inactivity (Russians: OR 5.5; 95% CI, 1.3-22.9; Estonians: OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.3-7.1), and recent family discord (Russians: OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.1-9.9; Estonians: OR, 4.5; 95%, CI, 2.1-9.8). The variables that remained significant in the final model were having no partner (Estonians: OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.6-5.5), being unemployed (Estonians: OR, 5.5; 95% CI, 2.0-15.4), and being an abstainer (Estonians: OR, 6.7; 95% CI, 2.5-17.6) for Estonians, and somatic illness (Russians: OR, 4.1; 95% CI, 1.4-11.7), separation (Russians: OR, 32.3; 95% CI, 2.9-364.1), and death of a close person (Russians: OR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.04-0.7) for Russians.
Although the predicting factors of suicide were similar among the Estonian Russians and Estonians, there were still some differences in the nature of recent life events. Higher suicide rate among Estonian Russians in 1999 could be at least partly attributable to their higher substance consumption.
根据社会人口背景、物质使用模式和近期生活事件,探究爱沙尼亚俄罗斯移民自杀受害者与爱沙尼亚本地人之间的差异,以找出预测自杀的特定移民因素。
心理解剖研究纳入了1999年自杀的427人以及按地区、性别、年龄和国籍随机选取的427名对照者。
俄罗斯和爱沙尼亚自杀案例之间唯一显著不同的变量是物质使用模式。逻辑回归模型显示,两个民族与自杀相关的因素包括物质依赖和滥用(俄罗斯人:比值比[OR],12.9;95%置信区间[95%CI],4.2 - 39.2;爱沙尼亚人:OR,8.1;95%CI,3.9 - 16.4)、经济不活跃(俄罗斯人:OR 5.5;95%CI,1.3 - 22.9;爱沙尼亚人:OR,3.1;95%CI,1.3 - 7.1)以及近期家庭不和(俄罗斯人:OR,3.2;95%CI,1.1 - 9.9;爱沙尼亚人:OR,4.5;95%CI,2.1 - 9.8)。最终模型中仍显著的变量,对于爱沙尼亚人来说,是没有伴侣(OR,3.0;95%CI,1.6 - 5.5)、失业(OR,5.5;95%CI,2.0 - 15.4)和戒酒者(OR,6.7;95%CI,2.5 - 17.6);对于俄罗斯人来说,是躯体疾病(OR,4.1;95%CI,1.4 - 11.7)、分居(OR,32.3;95%CI,2.9 - 364.1)和近亲死亡(OR,0.2;95%CI,0.04 - 0.7)。
尽管爱沙尼亚俄罗斯人和爱沙尼亚人自杀的预测因素相似,但近期生活事件的性质仍存在一些差异。1999年爱沙尼亚俄罗斯人自杀率较高至少部分可归因于他们更高的物质消费量。