Nash Jonathan D, Newberg Andrew B
Retired, Unaffiliated, Chiangmai, Thailand.
Department of Integrative Medicine and Nutritional Sciences, Jefferson University Hospitals, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Front Psychol. 2023 Feb 8;13:1062535. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1062535. eCollection 2022.
This paper revisits the proposal for the classification of meditation methods which we introduced in our initial 2013 publication, "Toward a Universal Taxonomy and Definition of Meditation". At that time, we advanced the thesis that meditation methods could be effectively segregated into three orthogonal categories by integrating the taxonomic principle of functional essentialism and the paradigm of Affect and Cognition; and we presented relevant research findings which supported that assertion. This iteration expands upon those theoretical and methodological elements by articulating a more comprehensive Three Tier Classification System which accounts for the full range of meditation methods; and demonstrates how recent neuroscience research continues to validate and support our thesis. This paper also introduces a novel criterion-based protocol for formulating classification systems of meditation methods, and demonstrates how this model can be used to compare and evaluate various other taxonomy proposals that have been published over the past 15 years.
本文重新审视了我们在2013年最初发表的《迈向冥想的通用分类法和定义》中提出的冥想方法分类建议。当时,我们提出了这样一个论点,即通过整合功能本质主义的分类原则以及情感与认知范式,冥想方法可以有效地分为三个正交类别;并且我们展示了支持该论断的相关研究结果。此次修订通过阐述一个更全面的三层分类系统来扩展这些理论和方法要素,该系统涵盖了所有冥想方法;并展示了近期神经科学研究如何继续验证和支持我们的论点。本文还引入了一种基于标准的新颖方案来制定冥想方法的分类系统,并展示了该模型如何用于比较和评估过去15年中发表的各种其他分类法建议。