Dimoska Aneta, Johnstone Stuart J
Brain and Behaviour Research Institute, Department of Psychology, University of Wollongong, Northfields Ave, Wollongong, NSW 2522, Australia.
Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2007 Mar 30;31(2):443-54. doi: 10.1016/j.pnpbp.2006.11.009. Epub 2006 Dec 15.
Impaired inhibitory processing has been implicated in clinical expressions of impulsivity, but it is unknown whether the same deficit underlies the personality trait in healthy, non-clinical populations. The present study examined performance and event-related potentials (ERPs) during a stop-signal task in non-clinical adults who scored in the top ("Low" n=20) and bottom 15% ("High" n=20) on Eysenck's Impulsiveness Questionnaire from a sample of 200 subjects. The stop-signal task consisted of a visual choice-RT task and auditory stop-signals presented on 30% of trials. While performance findings revealed no differences between groups, underlying ERPs revealed a number of quantitative differences. Lateralised readiness potential (LRP) amplitude on stop-signal trials was larger in the High than Low group, indicating greater response side-specific motor preparation in the primary motor cortex (PMC), while an N1/P3 complex was evoked on successful stop-signal trials and was also enhanced in the High than Low group. The centrally-maximal successful-stop P3 has previously been implicated as an index of inhibition in the PMC, suggesting enhanced inhibitory processing in the High group. Together these findings indicate that the High impulsivity group was able to counteract an impulsive response style on stop-signal trials with enhanced inhibitory activation, resulting in comparable overt performance to the Low group. These results provide a unique insight into the neural mechanisms underlying trait impulsivity in non-clinical adults.
抑制性加工受损与冲动性的临床表现有关,但尚不清楚在健康的非临床人群中,同样的缺陷是否是人格特质的基础。本研究对200名受试者中在艾森克冲动性问卷得分前15%(“低冲动性”组,n = 20)和后15%(“高冲动性”组,n = 20)的非临床成年人在停止信号任务中的表现和事件相关电位(ERP)进行了检查。停止信号任务包括一个视觉选择反应时任务和在30%的试验中呈现的听觉停止信号。虽然表现结果显示两组之间没有差异,但潜在的ERP显示出一些数量上的差异。在停止信号试验中,高冲动性组的侧化准备电位(LRP)幅度大于低冲动性组,表明初级运动皮层(PMC)中特定反应侧的运动准备更强,而在成功的停止信号试验中诱发了N1/P3,且高冲动性组的该电位也增强。先前已将中央最大成功停止P3作为PMC中抑制的指标,这表明高冲动性组的抑制性加工增强。这些发现共同表明,高冲动性组能够在停止信号试验中通过增强抑制性激活来抵消冲动反应风格,从而在公开表现上与低冲动性组相当。这些结果为非临床成年人特质冲动性的神经机制提供了独特的见解。