Johnstone Stuart J, Barry Robert J, Clarke Adam R
Brain & Behaviour Research Institute and School of Psychology, University of Wollongong, NSW, Australia.
Int J Psychophysiol. 2007 Oct;66(1):37-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2007.05.011. Epub 2007 Jun 5.
Previous research has shown that children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder of the Combined Type (AD/HDcom) have problems with response inhibition, with poorer task performance and atypical inhibition-related ERPs relative to control subjects, while little is known about response inhibition in children with Attention-deficit Hyperactivity Disorder of the Predominantly Inattentive Type (AD/HDin). In this study children with AD/HDin (N=12), AD/HDcom (N=13) and age-matched controls (N=13) aged between 8 and 14 years completed a Stop-signal task, with visual Go and auditory Stop-signal stimuli, while EEG was recorded. The results indicated that the groups did not differ on any inhibitory task performance measure, but the AD/HD groups showed more errors of omission to Go stimuli than controls. ERPs to the visual Go stimuli differed between children with AD/HDin and controls (increased central N1 and N2, decreased central P2 and increased parietal P3), while the AD/HDcom group showed only minor scalp distribution differences for N2 and P3. The AD/HDin group showed amplitude differences from controls to Stop signals (larger central N1 and parietal P3; reduced midline N2) and did not show a Successful vs. Failed inhibition effect for P3. The AD/HDcom group showed reduced parietal P3 to Stop signals, with the Trial Type effect present for N2 but not P3. These data suggest that the apparent atypical inhibitory processing at N2 and P3 may stem, at least in part, from atypical early sensory/alerting processing of all stimuli in children with AD/HDin.
先前的研究表明,患有混合型注意力缺陷多动障碍(AD/HDcom)的儿童在反应抑制方面存在问题,与对照组相比,其任务表现较差且与抑制相关的事件相关电位(ERP)异常,而对于主要表现为注意力不集中型的注意力缺陷多动障碍(AD/HDin)儿童的反应抑制情况知之甚少。在本研究中,12名患有AD/HDin、13名患有AD/HDcom的8至14岁儿童以及13名年龄匹配的对照组儿童完成了一项停止信号任务,该任务包含视觉启动信号和听觉停止信号刺激,同时记录脑电图。结果表明,三组在任何抑制任务表现指标上均无差异,但AD/HD组对启动信号的遗漏错误比对照组更多。患有AD/HDin的儿童与对照组对视觉启动信号的ERP存在差异(中央N1和N2增加,中央P2减少,顶叶P3增加),而AD/HDcom组在N2和P3的头皮分布上仅有微小差异。AD/HDin组与对照组对停止信号的振幅存在差异(中央N1和顶叶P3更大;中线N2减少),且P3未表现出成功与失败抑制效应。AD/HDcom组对停止信号的顶叶P3减少,N2存在试验类型效应,P3则没有。这些数据表明,N2和P3处明显的非典型抑制处理可能至少部分源于患有AD/HDin的儿童对所有刺激的非典型早期感觉/警觉处理。