Walker R M
Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida College of Medicine, Tampa 33612-4799.
JAMA. 1991 Nov 6;266(17):2407-12.
Should do-not-resuscitate (DNR) orders be routinely rescinded when terminally ill patients undergo palliative surgery? If so, patients will be forced to balance the benefits of palliative surgery against the risks of unwanted resuscitation. If physicians are required to honor intraoperative DNR orders, they may feel unacceptably restrained from correcting adverse effects for which they feel responsible. This dilemma has been overlooked by DNR policies. This article argues for the permissibility of honoring intraoperative DNR orders. The patient's right to refuse treatment outweighs physicians' concerns about professional scrutiny over intraoperative deaths. Physicians' moral concerns about hastening patient death are important but may be assuaged by (1) emphasizing patients' acceptance of operative mortality risk; (2) viewing matters as analogous to surgery on Jehovah's Witnesses who refuse lifesaving transfusion; (3) viewing the patient's intraoperative death as a double effect, that is, an unintended negative effect that is linked to the performance of a good act (palliation); and (4) distinguishing this from assisted suicide.
当绝症患者接受姑息性手术时,是否应该常规撤销不要复苏(DNR)医嘱?如果是这样,患者将被迫权衡姑息性手术的益处与不必要复苏的风险。如果要求医生遵守术中DNR医嘱,他们可能会觉得在纠正他们认为应负责的不良反应时受到了不可接受的限制。这种困境被DNR政策忽视了。本文主张遵守术中DNR医嘱是可行的。患者拒绝治疗的权利超过了医生对术中死亡受到专业审查的担忧。医生对加速患者死亡的道德担忧很重要,但可以通过以下方式得到缓解:(1)强调患者对手术死亡风险的接受;(2)将此事视为类似于拒绝输血的耶和华见证人的手术;(3)将患者的术中死亡视为一种双重效应,即与一项善举(姑息治疗)相关的意外负面效应;以及(4)将其与协助自杀区分开来。