Krizsan S J, Randby A T
Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, NO-1432 As, Norway.
J Anim Sci. 2007 Apr;85(4):984-96. doi: 10.2527/jas.2005-587. Epub 2006 Dec 18.
This study was designed to separate the effect of fermentation quality on voluntary intake of grass silage from other feed factors affecting intake. Variations in DMI were quantified, and the impact on intake was modeled. The relationships between individual silage components and intake were examined. A partially balanced changeover experiment with 30 Norwegian Red steers (137 +/- 16.4 kg of BW) was carried out to determine the intake of 24 silages and of hay harvested from the same parent crop within 60 h. Five forages were fed at a time in each of five 3-wk periods. Every 3-wk period was preceded by 2 wk of feeding a standard silage. Silage DMI ranged from 1.79 to 2.65, with a mean of 2.38 kg x 100 kg of BW(-1) x d(-1). Hay DMI averaged 2.43 kg x 100 kg of BW(-1) x d(-1). Ranges (mean) for the composition of silages were as follows: DM, 166 to 237 (213) g/kg; water-soluble carbohydrates, 16.3 to 70.9 (33.0) g/kg of DM; acetic acid, 11.5 to 64.7 (28.6) g/kg of DM; propionic acid, 0 to 5.2 (1.0) g/kg of DM; butyric acid, 0 to 25.1 (6.0) g/kg of DM; lactic acid, 2.2 to 102 (49.3) g/kg of DM; and NH3-N (not corrected for additive-derived N), 89.3 to 255 (153) g/kg of total N. Silage DMI was closely (P < 0.05) related to DM, ADL, VFA, lactic acid, total acids, the lactic acid:total acids ratio, ADIN, NH3-N (not corrected), histamine, tryptamine, cadaverine, and the total sum of amines (the explained variation in intake ranged from 14 to 53%). The 2 best models describing silage DMI included concentrations in the silage of propionic acid, butyric acid, and lactic acid, and these models explained 75 and 84% of the variation in DMI. The strong correlation (r = 0.84, P < 0.05) between total NH3-N and butyric acid concentrations in silages indicates that these variables described the same variation pattern. The inclusion of NH3-N in the equations describing the effect of fermentation quality on DMI of low-DM grass silage was less useful than that of butyric acid. This was due to the confounded relationship between the NH3-N concentration in silages and the use of ammonium-containing preservatives and to difficulties in correcting for the added ammonium.
本研究旨在将青贮发酵质量对青草青贮料采食量的影响与其他影响采食量的饲料因素区分开来。对干物质采食量(DMI)的变化进行了量化,并对其对采食量的影响进行了建模。研究了青贮料各成分与采食量之间的关系。用30头挪威红牛阉牛(体重137±16.4千克)进行了一项部分平衡转换试验,以测定24种青贮料以及从同一亲本作物收获的干草在60小时内的采食量。在五个3周的时间段内,每次饲喂五种草料。每个3周时间段之前先有2周饲喂标准青贮料。青贮料的DMI范围为1.79至2.65,平均为2.38千克×100千克体重⁻¹×天⁻¹。干草的DMI平均为2.43千克×100千克体重⁻¹×天⁻¹。青贮料成分的范围(平均值)如下:干物质(DM),166至237(213)克/千克;水溶性碳水化合物,16.3至70.9(33.0)克/千克DM;乙酸,11.5至64.7(28.6)克/千克DM;丙酸,0至5.2(1.0)克/千克DM;丁酸,0至25.1(6.0)克/千克DM;乳酸,2.2至102(49.3)克/千克DM;以及氨态氮(未校正添加剂衍生的氮),89.3至255(153)克/千克总氮。青贮料DMI与DM、酸性洗涤木质素(ADL)、挥发性脂肪酸(VFA)、乳酸、总酸、乳酸:总酸比值、酸性洗涤不溶性氮(ADIN)、氨态氮(未校正)、组胺、色胺、尸胺以及胺类总和密切相关(P<0.05)(采食量的解释变异范围为14%至53%)。描述青贮料DMI的两个最佳模型包括青贮料中丙酸、丁酸和乳酸的浓度,这些模型解释了DMI变异的75%和84%。青贮料中总氨态氮与丁酸浓度之间的强相关性(r = 0.84,P<0.05)表明这些变量描述了相同的变异模式。在描述发酵质量对低干物质青草青贮料DMI影响的方程中纳入氨态氮不如纳入丁酸有用。这是由于青贮料中氨态氮浓度与含铵防腐剂的使用之间存在混淆关系,以及校正添加铵存在困难。