Suppr超能文献

光子计数直方图与荧光强度分布分析之间的比较。

A comparison between photon counting histogram and fluorescence intensity distribution analysis.

作者信息

Meng Fanbo, Ma Hui

机构信息

Department of Physics and The Key Lab of Atomic and Molecular Nano Sciences, Ministry of Education, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

J Phys Chem B. 2006 Dec 28;110(51):25716-20. doi: 10.1021/jp063845r.

Abstract

Photon counting histogram (PCH) and fluorescence intensity distribution analysis (FIDA) are two methods that were developed independently but reported almost simultaneously. Both of them have been successfully applied to fluorescence fluctuation spectroscopy (FFS). Though publications have indicated that they are theoretically equivalent, they are still commonly considered as different methods, especially in their ways to treat the point spread functions (PSFs). In this paper, the two methods are examined in detail for a direct comparison. After a direct proof of the theoretical equivalence, the authors further point out that PCH and FIDA are completely equivalent in the way of modeling PSFs; that is, any modeling approach developed from one of them can always be applied to the other. It is also demonstrated that simplified FIDA and PCH formulas in the form of power series can be applied for fast and precise numerical calculations. The two methods are also compared for their merits in the calculation efficiency.

摘要

光子计数直方图(PCH)和荧光强度分布分析(FIDA)是两种独立开发但几乎同时报道的方法。它们都已成功应用于荧光涨落光谱(FFS)。尽管有文献表明它们在理论上是等效的,但它们仍通常被视为不同的方法,尤其是在处理点扩散函数(PSF)的方式上。在本文中,对这两种方法进行了详细研究以进行直接比较。在直接证明理论等效性之后,作者进一步指出,PCH和FIDA在PSF建模方式上是完全等效的;也就是说,从其中一种方法开发出的任何建模方法都可以始终应用于另一种方法。还证明了以幂级数形式的简化FIDA和PCH公式可用于快速精确的数值计算。还比较了这两种方法在计算效率方面的优点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验