Guazzi M, Belletti S, Lenatti L, Bianco E, Guazzi M D
University of Milan, San Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Eur J Clin Invest. 2007 Jan;37(1):26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2362.2007.01744.x.
Cardioversion (CV) to sinus rhythm corrects endothelial dysfunction secondary to atrial fibrillation (AF). As AF often complicates hypertension and diabetes (disorders associated with impaired endothelial function) the study probed whether these comorbidities to AF produced an additive effect and to what extent CV might be advantageous.
Brachial artery flow-mediated dilatation (FMD) was evaluated before and after CV in 17 lone AF patients (group 1), 16 patients with AF + hypertension (group 2) and 17 patients with AF + diabetes type II (group 3), while in supine and head-up tilting (HUT) positions, as this is when endothelial vasodilation is emphasized as a counterbalance to neurogenic vasoconstriction.
After 2 weeks, CV in group 1 increased (P < 0.01) supine FMD (from 7.22-->9.50%) and restored its HUT potentiation (from 9.31-->17.22%). In group 2, FMD also improved significantly with CV (supine from 4.92-->7.11% and HUT from 5.29-->11.83%; P < 0.01). In group 3, CV did not promote significant FMD changes (supine from 5.12-->4.92% and HUT from 4.98-->4.73%). After 3 months, FMD improvement persisted in groups 1 and 2 with enduring sinus rhythm, but not in those with AF relapse. In group 3, FMD remained unchanged regardless of cardiac rhythm.
Cardioversion persistently increases supine shear stress endothelial responsiveness and restores the orthostatic modulation in AF alone or in association with hypertension, but not with diabetes. Differences in background endothelial impairment may explain the presence (hypertension) or the absence (diabetes) of an additive AF effect in comorbidities, as well as CV results.
转复为窦性心律可纠正继发于房颤(AF)的内皮功能障碍。由于房颤常并发高血压和糖尿病(与内皮功能受损相关的疾病),本研究探讨了这些房颤合并症是否产生叠加效应,以及转复在多大程度上具有优势。
对17例孤立性房颤患者(第1组)、16例房颤合并高血压患者(第2组)和17例房颤合并II型糖尿病患者(第3组)在转复前后进行肱动脉血流介导的血管舒张功能(FMD)评估,评估时分别处于仰卧位和头高位倾斜(HUT)位,因为此时强调内皮血管舒张作为对神经源性血管收缩的一种平衡。
2周后,第1组转复后仰卧位FMD增加(P < 0.01)(从7.22%增至9.50%),并恢复其HUT位增强效应(从9.31%增至17.22%)。第2组转复后FMD也显著改善(仰卧位从4.92%增至7.11%,HUT位从5.29%增至11.83%;P < 0.01)。第3组转复后未促进FMD显著变化(仰卧位从5.12%降至4.92%,HUT位从4.98%降至4.73%)。3个月后,第1组和第2组持续窦性心律者FMD改善持续存在,房颤复发者则无。第3组无论心律如何,FMD均无变化。
转复可持续增加仰卧位剪切应力下的内皮反应性,并恢复孤立性房颤或合并高血压患者的直立位调节,但对合并糖尿病患者无效。背景内皮损伤的差异可能解释了合并症中房颤叠加效应的存在(高血压)或不存在(糖尿病)以及转复结果。