Therrell Bradford L, Hannon W Harry
National Newborn Screening and Genetics Resource Center, Austin, Texas 78757, USA.
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2006;12(4):236-45. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.20124.
Newborn screening has existed as a state-based public health service since the early 1960s. Every state and most territorial jurisdictions have comprehensive newborn screening programs in place, but in the United States a national newborn screening policy does not exist. This results in different administrative infrastructures, screening requirements, laboratory and follow-up services, medical management approaches, and related activities across the country. Federal initiatives and support have contributed to limited evaluations of various aspects of individual newborn screening programs at the national level, but funding is an issue. The national evaluation strategies have taken various forms, all with the intent of improving the screening system through review of actions taken and suggestions for future improvements. While participation in the national evaluation effort for newborn screening laboratory practices includes all US programs, and this has aided in improving quality and harmonizing protocols, other national evaluation activities have been only moderately successful. National data reporting of quality indicators for various program elements must be comprehensive and timely, and the elements must be universally accepted in order to meet the evaluation and improvement needs of the national newborn screening system. A comprehensive real time national evaluation activity will likely require additional resources and enforcement incentives. Limited federal actions through grant incentives and selected reporting requirements provide a possible means of stimulating programs to participate in national harmonization efforts.
自20世纪60年代初以来,新生儿筛查一直作为一项基于州的公共卫生服务存在。每个州和大多数属地管辖区都有全面的新生儿筛查项目,但在美国不存在国家新生儿筛查政策。这导致全国各地的行政基础设施、筛查要求、实验室及后续服务、医疗管理方法和相关活动各不相同。联邦倡议和支持对国家层面个别新生儿筛查项目的各个方面进行了有限的评估,但资金是个问题。国家评估策略采取了多种形式,其目的都是通过审查已采取的行动和对未来改进的建议来改善筛查系统。虽然参与新生儿筛查实验室实践的国家评估工作涵盖了所有美国项目,这有助于提高质量和统一方案,但其他国家评估活动仅取得了一定程度的成功。各种项目要素的质量指标的国家数据报告必须全面且及时,并且这些要素必须得到普遍认可,才能满足国家新生儿筛查系统的评估和改进需求。全面的实时国家评估活动可能需要额外的资源和执行激励措施。通过拨款激励和选定的报告要求采取的有限联邦行动提供了一种可能的手段,以刺激各项目参与国家协调努力。