Abramowitz Susan, Greene Danielle
New York University School of Medicine, Pediatrics Infectious Diseases Program, New York, USA.
AIDS Public Policy J. 2005 Fall-Winter;20(3-4):108-25.
Congress enacted the Ryan White Comprehensive AIDS Resources Emergency (CARE) Act in 1990 to address the unmet health needs of persons living with HIV (PLWH) by funding primary healthcare and support services to enhance access to and retention in care. The CARE Act was amended and reauthorized in 1996 and in 2000, and again in December 2006. As originally enacted, the CARE Act was a compromise across a wide political divide. A structure was established that distributed Ryan White CARE Act (RWCA) funds through five federal titles, with different parameters set for each title. Some funds were placed under federal control, while others were controlled locally and distributed to cities and states. Some funds were earmarked for specific services or populations, such as medications; others could be assigned according to a community's priorities. Title IV, the section of the RWCA dedicated to serving women, children, youth, and families who are infected with and affected by HIV/AIDS, is unique, even given the diversity of the other titles. The Title IV program was first implemented in 1988 as the Pediatric AIDS Demonstration Program. It became part of the CARE Act in 1994, and its purpose was expanded at that time to create better links between medical and support services. Although it is the smallest of the titles, with less than 4 percent of the RWCA budget, it may have the broadest mission: providing medical, logistical, psychosocial, and developmental care not just to persons living with the virus, but to entire families. In addition to its focus on this target population, Title IV is unique in its recognition of the need for, and historic support of, comprehensive systems of care to improve, expand, and coordinate service delivery, HIV-prevention efforts, and clinical research. Title IV was excluded from a 10 percent administrative cap on administrative expenses, which enables its funded programs to accomplish this mission. As of 2003, Title IV supported 74 family projects in 34 states (including Puerto Rico, the District of Columbia, and the Virgin Islands), which was a 28 percent increase in funded grantees and a 35 percent increase in participating states since 1999. However, the program's expansion was not matched with a comparable examination of its impact. Rather, the U.S. Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), the agency responsible for administering the RWCA, has focussed its evaluation interests on developing goals to use in evaluating its overall RWCA program and in evaluating shorter-term demonstration projects that have more-limited goals. Previous assessments of HIV/AIDS provider networks have examined the following: The process of network development and the determinants of successful implementation, The feasibility of collecting data from network providers, and The mechanisms of agency collaboration and care coordination at the provider level. Only recently has HRSA begun work on developing theoretical frameworks that are useful in exploring the relationships between network characteristics, participating providers, and clients' health and psychosocial outcomes. An examination of Title IV projects is appropriate for a number of reasons. No systematic study of the program has been published to date. Knowledge of the organization of Title IV projects, as well as the services they provide, will improve policy makers' understanding of the range and importance of the strategies that Title IV programs use to meet the needs of the populations they serve. Moreover, as the demand for RWCA funding grows, Title IV projects could offer a model for the efficient deployment of scarce resources.
1990年,美国国会颁布了《瑞安·怀特艾滋病综合资源紧急救助(CARE)法案》,旨在通过资助初级医疗保健和支持服务,满足艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)未得到满足的健康需求,以增加获得护理的机会并提高护理的持续性。《CARE法案》于1996年、2000年以及2006年12月进行了修订和重新授权。最初颁布时,《CARE法案》是广泛政治分歧下的一项妥协。该法案建立了一种结构,通过五个联邦项目分配瑞安·怀特CARE法案(RWCA)资金,每个项目设定了不同的参数。一些资金由联邦控制,而其他资金则由地方控制并分配给城市和州。一些资金专门用于特定服务或人群,如药物治疗;其他资金可根据社区的优先事项进行分配。第IV项目是RWCA中专门为感染艾滋病毒/艾滋病的妇女、儿童、青年和家庭提供服务的部分,即便与其他项目的多样性相比,它也独具特色。第IV项目最初于1988年作为儿科艾滋病示范项目实施。1994年它成为《CARE法案》的一部分,当时其目的得到扩展,以在医疗服务和支持服务之间建立更好的联系。尽管它是规模最小的项目,占RWCA预算不到4%,但其使命可能最为广泛:不仅为病毒感染者,也为整个家庭提供医疗、后勤、心理社会和发育护理。除了关注这一目标人群外,第IV项目的独特之处还在于它认识到需要建立全面的护理系统,并在历史上一直给予支持,以改善、扩大和协调服务提供、艾滋病毒预防工作及临床研究。第IV项目不受行政费用10%上限的限制,这使其资助的项目能够完成这一使命。截至2003年,第IV项目在34个州(包括波多黎各、哥伦比亚特区和美属维尔京群岛)支持了74个家庭项目,自1999年以来,获得资助的受赠方增加了28%,参与的州增加了35%。然而,该项目的扩展并未伴随着对其影响进行类似的审查。相反,负责管理RWCA的美国卫生资源与服务管理局(HRSA)将其评估重点放在制定用于评估整个RWCA项目以及评估目标更有限的短期示范项目的目标上。此前对艾滋病毒/艾滋病服务提供网络的评估考察了以下方面:网络发展过程和成功实施的决定因素、从网络提供者收集数据的可行性,以及提供者层面的机构合作和护理协调机制。直到最近,HRSA才开始着手制定有助于探索网络特征、参与的提供者与客户的健康及心理社会结果之间关系的理论框架。对第IV项目进行审查有诸多原因。迄今为止,尚未发表对该项目的系统研究。了解第IV项目的组织情况及其提供的服务,将提高政策制定者对第IV项目用以满足其所服务人群需求的策略范围和重要性的理解。此外,随着对RWCA资金需求的增长,第IV项目可为有效配置稀缺资源提供一个模式。