Nuthmann Antje, Engbert Ralf, Kliegl Reinhold
Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, Am Neuen Palais 10, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
Vision Res. 2007 Mar;47(7):990-1002. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2006.11.005. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
Fixation durations in reading are longer for within-word fixation positions close to word center than for positions near word boundaries. This counterintuitive result was termed the Inverted-Optimal Viewing Position (IOVP) effect. We proposed an explanation of the effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations [Nuthmann, A., Engbert, R., & Kliegl, R. (2005). Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect. Vision Research, 45, 2201-2217], that suggests that the IOVP effect is not related to word processing. Here we demonstrate the existence of an IOVP effect in "mindless reading", a z-string scanning task. We compare the results from experimental data with results obtained from computer simulations of a simple model of the IOVP effect and discuss alternative accounts. We conclude that oculomotor errors, which often induce mislocalized fixations, represent the most important source of the IOVP effect.
在阅读中,对于位于单词中心附近的词内注视位置,其注视持续时间比位于单词边界附近的位置更长。这一违反直觉的结果被称为倒U形最佳注视位置(IOVP)效应。我们基于对定位错误的注视进行纠错,提出了对该效应的一种解释 [努特曼,A.,恩格伯特,R.,& 克利格尔,R.(2005年)。阅读过程中定位错误的注视与倒U形最佳注视位置效应。《视觉研究》,45卷,2201 - 2217页],该解释表明IOVP效应与单词处理无关。在此,我们在一种“无心阅读”(一种Z字符串扫描任务)中证明了IOVP效应的存在。我们将实验数据的结果与从IOVP效应的简单模型的计算机模拟中获得的结果进行比较,并讨论其他解释。我们得出结论,经常导致注视位置错误的眼动误差是IOVP效应的最重要来源。