Suppr超能文献

阅读过程中的定位错误注视与倒置最佳注视位置效应。

Mislocated fixations during reading and the inverted optimal viewing position effect.

作者信息

Nuthmann Antje, Engbert Ralf, Kliegl Reinhold

机构信息

Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, 14415 Potsdam, Germany.

出版信息

Vision Res. 2005 Aug;45(17):2201-17. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.014. Epub 2005 Mar 29.

Abstract

Refixation probability during reading is lowest near the word center, suggestive of an optimal viewing position (OVP). Counterintuitively, fixation durations are largest at the OVP, a result called the inverted optimal viewing position (IOVP) effect [Vitu, McConkie, Kerr, & O'Regan, (2001). Vision Research 41, 3513-3533]. Current models of eye-movement control in reading fail to reproduce the IOVP effect. We propose a simple mechanism for generating this effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations due to saccadic errors. First, we propose an algorithm for estimating proportions of mislocated fixations from experimental data yielding a higher probability for mislocated fixations near word boundaries. Second, we assume that mislocated fixations trigger an immediate start of a new saccade program causing a decrease of associated durations. Thus, the IOVP effect could emerge as a result of a coupling between cognitive and oculomotor processes.

摘要

阅读过程中的重新注视概率在单词中心附近最低,这表明存在一个最佳注视位置(OVP)。与直觉相反的是,注视持续时间在最佳注视位置最长,这一结果被称为反向最佳注视位置(IOVP)效应[维图、麦康基、克尔和奥雷根,(2001年)。《视觉研究》41卷,3513 - 3533页]。当前阅读中眼动控制模型无法重现IOVP效应。我们基于对由于扫视误差导致的注视位置错误的纠错,提出了一种产生这种效应的简单机制。首先,我们提出一种算法,用于从实验数据中估计注视位置错误的比例,结果显示在单词边界附近注视位置错误的概率更高。其次,我们假设注视位置错误会立即触发一个新的扫视程序的启动,从而导致相关持续时间的减少。因此,IOVP效应可能是认知和眼动过程之间耦合的结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验