Nuthmann Antje, Engbert Ralf, Kliegl Reinhold
Department of Psychology, University of Potsdam, P.O. Box 601553, 14415 Potsdam, Germany.
Vision Res. 2005 Aug;45(17):2201-17. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2005.02.014. Epub 2005 Mar 29.
Refixation probability during reading is lowest near the word center, suggestive of an optimal viewing position (OVP). Counterintuitively, fixation durations are largest at the OVP, a result called the inverted optimal viewing position (IOVP) effect [Vitu, McConkie, Kerr, & O'Regan, (2001). Vision Research 41, 3513-3533]. Current models of eye-movement control in reading fail to reproduce the IOVP effect. We propose a simple mechanism for generating this effect based on error-correction of mislocated fixations due to saccadic errors. First, we propose an algorithm for estimating proportions of mislocated fixations from experimental data yielding a higher probability for mislocated fixations near word boundaries. Second, we assume that mislocated fixations trigger an immediate start of a new saccade program causing a decrease of associated durations. Thus, the IOVP effect could emerge as a result of a coupling between cognitive and oculomotor processes.
阅读过程中的重新注视概率在单词中心附近最低,这表明存在一个最佳注视位置(OVP)。与直觉相反的是,注视持续时间在最佳注视位置最长,这一结果被称为反向最佳注视位置(IOVP)效应[维图、麦康基、克尔和奥雷根,(2001年)。《视觉研究》41卷,3513 - 3533页]。当前阅读中眼动控制模型无法重现IOVP效应。我们基于对由于扫视误差导致的注视位置错误的纠错,提出了一种产生这种效应的简单机制。首先,我们提出一种算法,用于从实验数据中估计注视位置错误的比例,结果显示在单词边界附近注视位置错误的概率更高。其次,我们假设注视位置错误会立即触发一个新的扫视程序的启动,从而导致相关持续时间的减少。因此,IOVP效应可能是认知和眼动过程之间耦合的结果。