Luke Steven G, Henderson John M
Department of Psychology and Neuroscience Center, Brigham Young University, Provo UT, USA.
Department of Psychology, University of California Davis, DavisCA, USA; Center for Mind and Brain, University of California, Davis, DavisCA, USA.
Front Psychol. 2016 Mar 1;7:257. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00257. eCollection 2016.
The present study investigated the influence of content meaningfulness on eye-movement control in reading and scene viewing. Texts and scenes were manipulated to make them uninterpretable, and then eye-movements in reading and scene-viewing were compared to those in pseudo-reading and pseudo-scene viewing. Fixation durations and saccade amplitudes were greater for pseudo-stimuli. The effect of the removal of meaning was seen exclusively in the tail of the fixation duration distribution in both tasks, and the size of this effect was the same across tasks. These findings suggest that eye movements are controlled by a common mechanism in reading and scene viewing. They also indicate that not all eye movements are responsive to the meaningfulness of stimulus content. Implications for models of eye movement control are discussed.
本研究调查了内容意义性对阅读和场景观看中眼动控制的影响。对文本和场景进行处理,使其无法理解,然后将阅读和场景观看中的眼动与假阅读和假场景观看中的眼动进行比较。假刺激的注视持续时间和扫视幅度更大。去除意义的影响仅在两项任务的注视持续时间分布尾部出现,且该影响的大小在两项任务中相同。这些发现表明,阅读和场景观看中的眼动由一种共同机制控制。它们还表明,并非所有眼动都对刺激内容的意义性有反应。文中讨论了这些发现对眼动控制模型的启示。