• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

面部形态对ANB、AF-BF及Wits评估的影响。

Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.

作者信息

Tanaka Jefferson Luis Oshiro, Ono Evelise, Filho Medici Edmundo, Cesar de Moraes Luiz, Cezar de Melo Castilho Julio, Leonelli de Moraes Mari Eli

机构信息

Dentistry School of São Jose dos Campos, São Paulo State University, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

World J Orthod. 2006 Winter;7(4):369-75.

PMID:17190230
Abstract

AIM

To assess the correlation between Wits and AF-BF appraisals with the ANB angle, and verify the influence of the facial type on these appraisals.

METHODS

Lateral cephalometric radiographs from 118 untreated individuals were separated into 3 groups according to the facial pattern (brachyfacial, mesofacial, and dolichofacial). The radiographs were digitized and submitted to ANB angle and Wits and AF-BF appraisals on computer software. All radiographs were retraced for intraobserver and interobserver error tests.

RESULTS

The Student's t test demonstrated no statistically significant differences on the intraobserver's test (P > .05). There were statistically significant differences in the readings of Wits values of the 3 groups and for AF-BF values in the brachyfacial and mesofacial groups (P <.05). The multiple linear regression tests demonstrated high correlation between ANB and AF-BF for the 3 groups (r2, 0.768). The same result was found for ANB and Wits (r2, 0.624).

CONCLUSION

Facial pattern does not have an influence on the correlation between ANB and AF-BF nor between ANB and Wits, but it does influence the measurements of ANB, AF-BF, and Wits.

摘要

目的

评估Wits值和AF - BF值与ANB角之间的相关性,并验证面部类型对这些评估的影响。

方法

将118例未经治疗个体的头颅侧位X线片根据面部形态(短面型、中面型和长面型)分为3组。将X线片数字化,并在计算机软件上进行ANB角、Wits值和AF - BF值评估。所有X线片均重新测量以进行观察者内和观察者间误差测试。

结果

Student's t检验显示观察者内测试无统计学显著差异(P >.05)。3组的Wits值读数以及短面型和中面型组的AF - BF值读数存在统计学显著差异(P <.05)。多元线性回归测试表明3组中ANB与AF - BF之间具有高度相关性(r2,0.768)。ANB与Wits之间也得到相同结果(r2,0.624)。

结论

面部形态对ANB与AF - BF之间以及ANB与Wits之间的相关性没有影响,但对面部形态对ANB、AF - BF和Wits测量值有影响。

相似文献

1
Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.面部形态对ANB、AF-BF及Wits评估的影响。
World J Orthod. 2006 Winter;7(4):369-75.
2
Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.咬合平面倾斜度对ANB及Wits评估前后颌关系的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):641-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025.
3
Assessment and predictability of ANB angle.ANB角的评估与可预测性
Aust Orthod J. 1990 Mar;11(3):173-7.
4
Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.描述颌骨前后关系的七个参数:青春期后预测准确性和互换性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jun;117(6):714-20.
5
A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship.用于评估矢状颌关系的头影测量分析比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Nov;18(11):679-83.
6
A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements.ANB、WITS、AF-BF和APDI测量值的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Feb;99(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C.
7
Longitudinal changes in the ANB angle and Wits appraisal: clinical implications.ANB角和Wits评估的纵向变化:临床意义
Am J Orthod. 1983 Aug;84(2):133-9. doi: 10.1016/0002-9416(83)90177-x.
8
ANB skeletal types correlated to facial morphology: Euclidean distance matrix analysis.与面部形态相关的ANB骨骼类型:欧氏距离矩阵分析
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg. 1993;8(3):181-90.
9
Comparison of craniofacial morphology in monozygotic twins with their siblings.同卵双胞胎与其兄弟姐妹的颅面形态比较。
J Clin Pediatr Dent. 1991 Spring;15(3):169-73.
10
Study between anb angle and Wits appraisal in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT).锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)中 anb 角与 Wits 值评估的研究。
Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jul 1;18(4):e725-32. doi: 10.4317/medoral.18919.

引用本文的文献

1
Sagittal Cephalometric Evaluation Without Point Nasion: Sagittal G-Triangle Analysis.无 Nasion 点的矢状头影测量评估:矢状 G-三角形分析。
J Craniofac Surg. 2022;33(2):521-525. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008290.
2
[Feasibility of Delaire cephalometric analysis to predict the ideal sagittal position of the maxilla and chin for surgery-first patients in orthognathic surgery].[戴莱尔头影测量分析预测正颌外科先行手术患者上颌骨和颏部理想矢状位的可行性]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Feb 18;52(1):90-96. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2020.01.014.
3
Evaluating the Correlation between Overjet and Skeletal Parameters Using DVT.
使用数字体积断层扫描(DVT)评估覆盖与骨骼参数之间的相关性。
Int J Dent. 2012;2012:921942. doi: 10.1155/2012/921942. Epub 2012 Jul 31.