• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

ANB、WITS、AF-BF和APDI测量值的比较。

A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements.

作者信息

Oktay H

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics Faculty of Dentistry, Atatürk University, Erzurum, Turkey.

出版信息

Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Feb;99(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C.

DOI:10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C
PMID:1990821
Abstract

In the present study, the relationships among ANB, Wits, AF-BF, and APDI measurements used in the assessment of the anteroposterior jaw disorders were examined on the cephalometric radiographs of 63 male and 82 female subjects, and high correlations were found among them. Furthermore, relationships were explored between these parameters and some measurements that were thought to have influenced them. The results of the geometric studies could not be proved on the basis of statistical evaluation.

摘要

在本研究中,在63名男性和82名女性受试者的头影测量X线片上,检查了用于评估颌骨前后部紊乱的ANB、Wits、AF - BF和APDI测量值之间的关系,发现它们之间存在高度相关性。此外,还探讨了这些参数与一些被认为对其有影响的测量值之间的关系。几何研究的结果无法通过统计评估得到证实。

相似文献

1
A comparison of ANB, WITS, AF-BF, and APDI measurements.ANB、WITS、AF-BF和APDI测量值的比较。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1991 Feb;99(2):122-8. doi: 10.1016/0889-5406(91)70114-C.
2
Seven parameters describing anteroposterior jaw relationships: postpubertal prediction accuracy and interchangeability.描述颌骨前后关系的七个参数:青春期后预测准确性和互换性。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2000 Jun;117(6):714-20.
3
Influence of the facial pattern on ANB, AF-BF, and Wits appraisal.面部形态对ANB、AF-BF及Wits评估的影响。
World J Orthod. 2006 Winter;7(4):369-75.
4
Influence of occlusal plane inclination on ANB and Wits assessments of anteroposterior jaw relationships.咬合平面倾斜度对ANB及Wits评估前后颌关系的影响。
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 May;129(5):641-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2005.09.025.
5
Age-related changes in sagittal relationship between the maxilla and mandible.上颌骨与下颌骨矢状关系的年龄相关变化。
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Dec;27(6):568-78. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji061. Epub 2005 Aug 10.
6
F-H to AB plane angle (FABA) for assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationships.用于评估颌骨前后关系的F-H至AB平面角(FABA)
Angle Orthod. 1995;65(3):223-31; discussion 232. doi: 10.1043/0003-3219(1995)065<0223:FTAPAF>2.0.CO;2.
7
The use of linear and angular measurements of maxillo-mandibular anteroposterior discrepancies.上颌-下颌前后差异的线性和角度测量的应用。
Clin Orthod Res. 1999 Feb;2(1):34-41. doi: 10.1111/ocr.1999.2.1.34.
8
[Reliability evaluation for thirteen parameters describing anteroposterior apical base relationship in Angle Class II division 1 patients].[安氏II类1分类患者描述前后向根尖基骨关系的13项参数的可靠性评估]
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2006 Aug;24(4):323-7.
9
A comparison of cephalometric analyses for assessing sagittal jaw relationship.用于评估矢状颌关系的头影测量分析比较
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2008 Nov;18(11):679-83.
10
Longitudinal cephalometric changes in the maxilla, mandible and maxillary-mandibular relationship between 10 and 14 years of age.10至14岁期间上颌骨、下颌骨及上下颌关系的头影测量纵向变化。
Aust Orthod J. 1999 Nov;15(5):284-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Selected Indicators Used in Cephalometric Analysis and Their Predictive Value in Defining Sagittal Discrepancy Malocclusions: A Comparative Study.头影测量分析中使用的选定指标及其在定义矢状不调错牙合中的预测价值:一项比较研究。
J Clin Med. 2025 May 14;14(10):3429. doi: 10.3390/jcm14103429.
2
Feasibility of occlusal plane in predicting the changes in anteroposterior mandibular position: a comprehensive analysis using deep learning-based three-dimensional models.咬合平面预测下颌前后位置变化的可行性:基于深度学习的三维模型的综合分析
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jan 8;25(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05345-9.
3
Comparison of Diagnostic Validity of Cephalometric Analyses of the ANB Angle and Tau Angle for Assessment of the Sagittal Relationship of Jaw and Mandible.
用于评估颌骨和下颌骨矢状关系的ANB角和Tau角头影测量分析的诊断有效性比较。
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 2;12(19):6333. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196333.
4
The Maxilla-Mandibular Discrepancies through Soft-Tissue References: Reliability and Validation of the Anteroposterior Measurement.通过软组织参考评估上颌-下颌差异:前后测量的可靠性与验证
Children (Basel). 2023 Feb 26;10(3):459. doi: 10.3390/children10030459.
5
Evaluation of Salivary Leptin Levels and Its Correlation with Class I, Class II, and Class III Facial Skeletal Pattern: A Prefatory Study.唾液瘦素水平评估及其与I类、II类和III类面部骨骼模式的相关性:一项初步研究。
Eur J Dent. 2021 Oct;15(4):647-652. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1727552. Epub 2021 Aug 24.
6
Efficiency of ODI and APDI of Kim's cephalometric analysis in a Latin American population with skeletal open bite.金氏头影测量分析中的ODI和APDI在拉丁美洲骨骼性开颌人群中的有效性。
Dental Press J Orthod. 2019 Aug 1;24(3):46-54. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.24.3.046-054.oar.
7
Sagittal discrepancies of the jaw in a Bangladeshi cohort: three-dimensional computed tomography analysis.孟加拉人群队列中颌骨矢状面差异:三维计算机断层扫描分析
J Int Med Res. 2019 Aug;47(8):3613-3622. doi: 10.1177/0300060519853927. Epub 2019 Jun 20.
8
Comparison of popular sagittal cephalometric analyses for validity and reliability.常见矢状面头影测量分析的有效性和可靠性比较。
Saudi Dent J. 2018 Jan;30(1):43-46. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2017.10.002. Epub 2017 Oct 28.
9
Cephalometric Floating Norms for the Angle and MMBP-Wits.Angle 和 MMBP-Wits 的头影测量浮动标准
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Apr 4;2018:8740731. doi: 10.1155/2018/8740731. eCollection 2018.
10
Three dimensional reliability analyses of currently used methods for assessment of sagittal jaw discrepancy.目前用于评估矢状颌骨差异的方法的三维可靠性分析。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2018 Apr 1;10(4):e352-e360. doi: 10.4317/jced.54578. eCollection 2018 Apr.