Van Dongen Hans P A
Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University-Spokane, Spokane, Washington 99210-1495, USA.
Chronobiol Int. 2006;23(6):1139-47. doi: 10.1080/07420520601100971.
Inter-individual differences in tolerance for shift work have been studied primarily in terms of external factors affecting alertness on the job or the ability to rest and sleep while at home. However, there is increasing evidence that neurobiological factors play a role as well, particularly the major processes involved in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness. These include a sleep homeostatic process seeking to balance wakefulness and sleep and a circadian process seeking to promote wakefulness during the day and sleep during the night. Shift work is associated with a temporal misalignment of these two endogenous processes. During nightwork, this misalignment makes it difficult to stay awake during the nightshift and sleep during the day. However, inter-individual variability in the processes involved in sleep/wake regulation is substantial. Recent studies have demonstrated the existence of inter-individual differences in vulnerability to cognitive deficits from sleep loss. Moreover, these inter-individual differences were shown to constitute a trait. Interestingly, self-evaluations of sleepiness did not correspond well with the trait inter-individual variability in objective levels of performance impairment during sleep deprivation. Perhaps because of this discrepancy, in operational settings, the inter-individual differences in vulnerability to sleep loss do not appear to be limited due to self-selection mechanisms. Indeed, even among a highly select group of active-duty jet fighter pilots flying a series of simulated night missions, systematic inter-individual differences in performance impairment from sleep loss were still observed. There are significant personal and economic consequences to human error and accidents caused by performance deficits due to sleep loss. It is important, therefore, to study the inter-individual differences in the regulation of sleep and wakefulness in the work environment so that cognitive impairment during shift work may be better anticipated and prevented.
关于轮班工作耐受性的个体差异,主要是从影响工作时警觉性或在家休息与睡眠能力的外部因素方面进行研究的。然而,越来越多的证据表明,神经生物学因素也发挥着作用,尤其是参与睡眠和觉醒调节的主要过程。这些过程包括一个旨在平衡觉醒和睡眠的睡眠稳态过程,以及一个旨在促进白天觉醒和夜间睡眠的昼夜节律过程。轮班工作与这两个内源性过程的时间失调有关。在夜间工作期间,这种失调使得在夜班时保持清醒和在白天睡眠变得困难。然而,睡眠/觉醒调节过程中的个体差异很大。最近的研究已经证明,在因睡眠不足导致认知缺陷的易感性方面存在个体差异。此外,这些个体差异被证明是一种特质。有趣的是,困倦的自我评估与睡眠剥夺期间客观表现受损水平的个体特质差异并不十分相符。也许正是由于这种差异,在实际工作环境中,因自我选择机制,睡眠不足易感性的个体差异似乎并未受到限制。事实上,即使在一组经过严格挑选、执行一系列模拟夜间任务的现役喷气式战斗机飞行员中,仍然观察到因睡眠不足导致的表现受损存在系统性的个体差异。因睡眠不足导致的表现缺陷所引发的人为错误和事故会带来重大的个人和经济后果。因此,研究工作环境中睡眠和觉醒调节的个体差异非常重要,这样可以更好地预测和预防轮班工作期间的认知障碍。