Juang Paul, Fish Douglas N, Jung Rose, MacLaren Robert
Department of Pharmacy Practice, St. Louis College of Pharmacy, St. Louis, Missouri 63110-1088, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2007 Jan;27(1):11-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.27.1.11.
To evaluate the clinical application of enteral glutamine supplementation in critically ill patients and compare the frequency of nosocomial infections in these patients with a historical control group in a burn intensive care unit (BICU), and to assess lengths of stay in the hospital and BICU, mortality rates, and safety profile of glutamine.
Retrospective case-control descriptive study.
A university-affiliated hospital BICU.
Seventeen patients receiving enteral glutamine supplementation and 15 historical control patients who were admitted to the BICU for thermal burn injuries from January 1, 2001-September 30, 2004.
Data for patients receiving enteral glutamine supplementation were identified through the pharmacy database, and data for the control patients were identified through the BICU patient registry. No significant differences were noted in baseline characteristics or nutritional parameters and outcomes between the two groups. The mean daily dose and duration of glutamine were 0.52 g/kg and 21.6 days, respectively. The mean number of infections/patient between the glutamine and control groups was similar (2.47 and 2.73, respectively) as was the number of gram-negative infections (1.29 and 1.20, respectively). Bloodstream infections occurred more frequently in the glutamine group (24 vs 8 patients, p=0.0006); however, cellulitis (4 vs 11, p=0.05) and pneumonia (9 vs 15, p=0.15) occurred less often. For the glutamine group versus control group, BICU length of stay (17.9 vs 15.3 days, p=NS), hospital length of stay (32.3 vs 26 days, p=NS), and mortality rates (0% vs 6.7%, p=NS) were similar between groups. No adverse events were attributed to glutamine supplementation.
Enteral glutamine supplementation was not associated with a change in the cumulative rate of infectious complications compared with the control group, but this was attributed to more cases of bloodstream infections and fewer cases of pneumonia and cellulitis in the glutamine group. Large, prospective, randomized trials designed to detect small but clinically relevant outcomes are needed to definitively determine the effect of enteral glutamine supplementation in the BICU population.
评估肠内补充谷氨酰胺在重症患者中的临床应用,并将这些患者的医院感染发生率与烧伤重症监护病房(BICU)的历史对照组进行比较,同时评估住院时间、在BICU的停留时间、死亡率以及谷氨酰胺的安全性。
回顾性病例对照描述性研究。
一所大学附属医院的BICU。
2001年1月1日至2004年9月30日期间,17例接受肠内谷氨酰胺补充的患者以及15例因热烧伤入住BICU的历史对照患者。
通过药房数据库确定接受肠内谷氨酰胺补充患者的数据,通过BICU患者登记册确定对照患者的数据。两组在基线特征、营养参数和结局方面未发现显著差异。谷氨酰胺的平均每日剂量和使用时间分别为0.52 g/kg和21.6天。谷氨酰胺组和对照组患者的平均感染次数相似(分别为2.47次和2.73次),革兰氏阴性菌感染次数也相似(分别为1.29次和1.20次)。谷氨酰胺组血流感染发生率更高(24例对8例,p = 0.0006);然而,蜂窝织炎(4例对11例,p = 0.05)和肺炎(9例对15例,p = 0.15)的发生率较低。谷氨酰胺组与对照组相比,在BICU的停留时间(17.9天对15.3天,p无统计学意义)、住院时间(32.3天对26天,p无统计学意义)和死亡率(0%对6.7%,p无统计学意义)相似。未发现与补充谷氨酰胺相关的不良事件。
与对照组相比,肠内补充谷氨酰胺与感染并发症的累积发生率变化无关,但这归因于谷氨酰胺组血流感染病例较多,肺炎和蜂窝织炎病例较少。需要进行大规模、前瞻性、随机试验以检测微小但具有临床相关性的结局,从而明确肠内补充谷氨酰胺对BICU患者的影响。