Limbach Michael
Laboratorium für Organische Chemie, Departement Chemie und Angewandte Biowissenschaften, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, ETH Hönggerberg, HCI, Wolfgang-Pauli-Strasse 10, CH-8093 Zürich, Switzerland.
Chem Biodivers. 2006 Feb;3(2):119-33. doi: 10.1002/cbdv.200690016.
Catalytic enantioselective methodology has dramatically been enriched by the re-discovery of the simple amino acid proline as a chiral catalyst in the year 2000. Although no catalyst offers such a simple and broad access to quite complex reaction products, as does proline, its synthetic potential is not unrestricted, what is especially connected to its poor solubility in organic media. Exchange of the carboxylic moiety by a tetrazole unit leads to proline surrogates, that by far outperform proline with respect to yield, enantioselectivity, reaction time, substrate and solvent scope, catalyst loading, and stoichiometry of the compounds used in excess. These factors are discussed and critically compared with selected representative proline-catalyzed reactions.
2000年,简单氨基酸脯氨酸作为一种手性催化剂的重新发现极大地丰富了催化对映选择性方法学。尽管没有哪种催化剂能像脯氨酸那样,以如此简单且广泛的方式获得相当复杂的反应产物,但其合成潜力并非不受限制,这尤其与其在有机介质中的低溶解度有关。用四唑单元取代羧基部分会生成脯氨酸替代物,这些替代物在产率、对映选择性、反应时间、底物和溶剂范围、催化剂负载量以及过量使用的化合物的化学计量等方面都远远优于脯氨酸。本文将对这些因素进行讨论,并与选定的代表性脯氨酸催化反应进行批判性比较。