Turner M
Scottish National Blood Transfusion Service, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK; 51, Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, UK.
Transfus Clin Biol. 2006 Nov;13(5):317-9. doi: 10.1016/j.tracli.2006.11.009. Epub 2006 Dec 28.
The purpose of these vignettes is to illustrate that although the dominant ethical, legal and societal position is based on the precautionary principle of deontological non-maleficence, in reality a degree of utilitarian proportionality arises because there is little choice but to balance proposed variant CJD risk management strategies against other ethical imperatives including failure of beneficence, non-maleficence with regard to others, autonomy and justice. There are no easy answers in balancing these issues, but it is important that it is more widely recognised that such moral judgements have to be made and that a wider debate in society occurs over where the balance should lie.
这些案例的目的是说明,尽管占主导地位的伦理、法律和社会立场基于义务论的不伤害预防原则,但实际上出现了一定程度的功利主义相称性,因为别无选择,只能在提议的变异型克雅氏病风险管理策略与其他伦理要求之间进行权衡,这些要求包括行善失败、对他人的不伤害、自主性和正义。在平衡这些问题时没有简单的答案,但更广泛地认识到必须做出这样的道德判断,并且社会应就平衡点所在展开更广泛的辩论,这一点很重要。