Takács István, Furka Andrea, Kotán Róbert, Boland Mehrdad Ghassem, Pósán János, Vágvölgyi Attila, Hallay Judit, Sápy Péter
Sebészeti Klinika.
Magy Seb. 2006 Oct;59(5):362-8.
The authors compare the results of the patients who underwent right hemihepatectomy through anterior approach with those by conventional hemihepatectomy. In 119 patients hemihepatectomy was done, 52 of them were anterior approaches. We used this technique when the tumor was large, or it seemed to be fragile and its mobilisation could be dangerous or infiltrated the diaphragm or the the hepatic vein's preparation was difficult or impossible. We started the operation with dissecting parenchyma from the anterior surface toward hilus without preparation and ligation of the affected vessels and bile duct. No patient died following anterior technique. Death and reoperation occurred in two cases following conventional hemihepatectomy. The operation time and the average nursing days was not significantly different. The blood transfusion was significantly less during anterior approach. However, between the two groups, in those cases when the operations were performed because of liver malignancies, there were no differences regarding to survival rate after 62 months follow up in contrast with the literature. The anterior technique used and modified by authors can be performed safely. The blood consumption is significantly less in the cases of anterior technique. There was no significant difference between the groups regarding to the operation-time and the average nursing days. The median survival rate was similar in both groups. Our team suggest this method of the anterior approach for liver resection in the above mentioned cases.
作者比较了经前入路行右半肝切除术患者与传统半肝切除术患者的结果。119例行半肝切除术,其中52例采用前入路。当肿瘤较大、质地脆弱、游离困难、侵犯膈肌、肝静脉准备困难或无法准备时,我们采用该技术。手术开始时,不预先处理和结扎受累血管及胆管,直接从前表面向肝门解剖肝实质。采用前入路技术无患者死亡。传统半肝切除术后有2例死亡并再次手术。手术时间和平均护理天数无显著差异。前入路术中输血明显较少。然而,与文献相比,两组中因肝脏恶性肿瘤行手术的患者,随访62个月后的生存率无差异。作者使用并改良的前入路技术可安全实施。前入路技术术中失血明显较少。两组在手术时间和平均护理天数方面无显著差异。两组的中位生存率相似。我们团队建议在上述病例中采用这种前入路肝切除方法。