Fulfer Jamie L, Tyler Jillian J, Choi Natalie J S, Young Jill A, Verhulst Steven J, Kovach Regina, Dorsey J Kevin
Southern Illinois University, School of Medicine, Springfield, IL 62794-9620, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2007 Feb;22(2):238-49. doi: 10.1177/0886260506295814.
A screening instrument for detecting intimate partner violence (IPV) was developed using indirect questions. The authors identified 5 of 18 items studied that clearly distinguished victims of IPV from a random group of health conference attendees with a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 87%. This 5-item instrument (SAFE-T) was then tested on 435 women presenting to three emergency departments and the results compared to a direct question regarding current abuse. The SAFE-T questions detected only 54% of the women who admitted being abused and correctly classified 81% of the women who said they were not victims. The 1-year prevalence of IPV in this sample of women presenting to an emergency department was 11.6%. The authors conclude that indirect questioning of women appears to be more effective at ruling out IPV in an emergency department population and may be less useful for women "early" in an abusive relationship.
一种用于检测亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的筛查工具通过间接问题得以开发。作者从所研究的18个项目中确定了5个,这些项目能明确区分亲密伴侣暴力的受害者与健康会议参会者的随机群体,灵敏度为85%,特异度为87%。然后,这个5项工具(SAFE-T)在前往三个急诊科就诊的435名女性中进行了测试,并将结果与关于当前受虐情况的直接问题的结果进行比较。SAFE-T问题仅检测出54%承认受虐的女性,且正确分类了81%称自己不是受害者的女性。在这个前往急诊科就诊的女性样本中,亲密伴侣暴力的1年患病率为11.6%。作者得出结论,对女性进行间接询问在排除急诊科人群中的亲密伴侣暴力方面似乎更有效,而对于处于虐待关系“早期”的女性可能用处较小。