Suppr超能文献

私营部门资助的职业健康研究良好实践指南。

Good Practice Guidelines for occupational health research funded by the private sector.

作者信息

Quinn M, Levenstein C, Delaurier G F

机构信息

Department of Work Environment, University of Massachusetts Lowell, MA 01854, USA.

出版信息

New Solut. 2001;11(4):295-306. doi: 10.2190/HERV-LXE2-KBN5-1UFF.

Abstract

The role of the private sector in funding academic research is increasing and the well-developed guidelines for government-sponsored research do not apply to the academic-industry arena. Good Practice Guidelines for privately funded occupational health research are necessary. Industry sponsors and academic researchers belong to differing systems with differing goals and means to achieve and evaluate them. As a result, problems are inherent in the relationship. Guidelines would benefit industry by providing criteria against which industry-funded research could be judged and evaluated. Guidelines would help university researchers assure that their work is examined and criticized on its merits. Such protection would foster quality research over the long term. Here, we consider the issues involved and explore questions that came out of a workshop convened under the auspices of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. When private funding is involved, university scientists have a professional responsibility to ensure that the integrity of researchers, subjects, and the research process is well protected. A body of experience allows us to create Good Practice Guidelines beneficial to all parties.

摘要

私营部门在资助学术研究方面的作用日益增强,而针对政府资助研究制定的完善指南并不适用于学术-产业领域。制定私营部门资助职业健康研究的良好实践指南很有必要。产业赞助商和学术研究人员属于不同的体系,有着不同的目标以及实现和评估目标的方式。因此,这种关系中存在一些固有问题。指南将通过提供可据此评判和评估产业资助研究的标准,使产业受益。指南将帮助大学研究人员确保其工作能依据自身价值得到审查和批评。从长远来看,这种保护将促进高质量研究。在此,我们考虑其中涉及的问题,并探讨在疾病控制与预防中心主持下召开的一次研讨会中出现的问题。当涉及私人资助时,大学科学家有专业责任确保研究人员、研究对象以及研究过程的诚信得到妥善保护。一系列经验使我们能够制定出对各方都有益的良好实践指南。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验