Hsieh Y D, Gau C H, Kung Wu S F, Shen E C, Hsu P W, Fu E
School of Dentistry, National Defense Medical Centre, Taipei, Taiwan.
Int Endod J. 2007 Jan;40(1):11-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01168.x.
To investigate the influence of the size and the depth of insertion of irrigating needles, and the diameter of the master apical file on flow distribution during fluid irrigation in root canals.
Stepback canal instrumentation was employed on seven extracted human single canal teeth. The size of the master apical files ranged from sizes 25, 30, 35, 40, 45, 50 to size 80 within the seven teeth, respectively. A thermal imaging system (ThermaCAM; National Instruments Co., Austin, TX, USA) was used to record the dynamic fluid distribution following root canal preparation. The dynamic fluid distribution was analysed during irrigation by insertion of different irrigating needle tips (23, 25 and 27 gauge) at various depths (3, 6 and 9 mm) from the root apex. The whole process of irrigation was recorded by a video camera and analysed by two observers separately. The success of the irrigation process was defined when the irrigant was able to flow into to the apical region immediately after injection.
The aqueous irrigant was flushed into the apical region when a size 27 gauge irrigating needle was placed into a size 30 canal at a point 3 mm from the apical stop. When the same needle tip was placed 6 mm from the root canal apex, successful irrigation was achieved only in the canals prepared to size 50 or larger. When a size 25 gauge irrigating needle was placed 3 mm from the working length, the canal size had to be no <45 to allow for successful irrigation. When a size 23 gauge needle was placed at the same position, the canal needed to be prepared to size 50 to allow thorough irrigation of the apex. At 9 mm from the apical stop, none of the irrigating needles could achieve successful irrigation of any canal size.
The flow distribution of root canal irrigation can be affected adversely by large diameter irrigating needles, by greater distances between the needle tip and the apical stop, and by narrow root canals.
研究冲洗针的尺寸和插入深度以及主尖锉直径对根管内液体冲洗时流量分布的影响。
对七颗拔除的人类单根管牙采用逐步后退法进行根管预备。在这七颗牙中,主尖锉的尺寸分别从25、30、35、40、45、50到80号。使用热成像系统(ThermaCAM;美国国家仪器公司,奥斯汀,德克萨斯州)记录根管预备后动态液体分布情况。在冲洗过程中,通过从根尖不同深度(3、6和9毫米)插入不同的冲洗针尖(23、25和27号)来分析动态液体分布。冲洗的全过程由摄像机记录,并由两名观察者分别进行分析。当冲洗剂注入后能立即流入根尖区域时,定义为冲洗过程成功。
当将27号冲洗针置于距根尖止点3毫米处的30号根管时,水性冲洗剂被冲入根尖区域。当将同一针尖置于距根管根尖6毫米处时,仅在预备到50号或更大尺寸的根管中能成功冲洗。当将25号冲洗针置于距工作长度3毫米处时,根管尺寸必须不小于45号才能成功冲洗。当将23号针置于同一位置时,根管需要预备到50号才能彻底冲洗根尖。在距根尖止点9毫米处,没有任何冲洗针能成功冲洗任何根管尺寸。
大直径冲洗针、针尖与根尖止点之间较大的距离以及狭窄的根管可能会对根管冲洗的流量分布产生不利影响。