Suppr超能文献

使用不同冲洗针进行根管清创的扫描电镜研究

Root canal debris removal using different irrigating needles: an SEM study.

作者信息

Ghivari Sheetal, Kubasad Girish

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sharad Pawar Dental College, Swangi (Meghe), Wardha, India.

出版信息

Indian J Dent Res. 2011 Sep-Oct;22(5):659-63. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.93452.

Abstract

AIM

This study was carried out to compare the efficacy of three irrigating needle designs in removal of debris from different parts of the root canal.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty human maxillary canines were prepared using HERO Shaper rotary system and irrigated with 1 ml of 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) after each instrument change. Three 25-gauge irrigation needle designs - brush-covered Navi Tip FX (Group I), side-vented needle RC Twents (Group II) and single-beveled (Group III) irrigating needles - were tested for their efficiency in debris removal in three different parts of the root canal (n=10 canals per group). Following instrumentation, the roots were vertically sectioned and divided into coronal, middle and apical thirds for observation under scanning electron microscope (×200 magnification). Debris on the canal wall was evaluated by using a four-scale scoring system described by Paque and his co-workers.

RESULTS

The canals irrigated with brush-covered needle Navi Tip FX (Group I) showed lower average debris score, indicating greater removal of debris in coronal third as compared to middle and apical thirds, whereas the canals irrigated with side-vented needle (Group II) and single-beveled needle (Group III) exhibited lower average score in the middle third than coronal and apical thirds. All the three needle designs exhibited higher debris score in apical third of the root canal. Tukey multiple comparisons test was applied at a significance level of P>0.05. A statistically significant difference (P<0.05) was observed in the debris removal in the coronal and middle thirds of root canals irrigated with brush-covered Navi Tip FX (Group I) and side-vented (Group II) needles, respectively, when compared with other needle design groups.

CONCLUSION

Within the limitations of this study, it can be concluded that all the needle designs tested were effective in certain regions of the root canal with apical third uncleaned. Side-vented needle by creating turbulence removed debris effectively in coronal and middle thirds.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在比较三种冲洗针设计在清除根管不同部位碎屑方面的效果。

材料与方法

使用HERO Shaper旋转系统对30颗人上颌尖牙进行预备,每次更换器械后用1毫升5.25%次氯酸钠(NaOCl)冲洗。测试三种25号冲洗针设计——带刷Navi Tip FX(第一组)、侧孔针RC Twents(第二组)和单斜面(第三组)冲洗针——在根管三个不同部位(每组n = 10个根管)清除碎屑的效率。预备完成后,将牙根垂直切片并分为冠部、中部和根尖三分之一,在扫描电子显微镜下(放大200倍)观察。使用Paque及其同事描述的四级评分系统评估根管壁上的碎屑。

结果

用带刷针Navi Tip FX(第一组)冲洗的根管平均碎屑评分较低,表明与中部和根尖三分之一相比,冠部三分之一的碎屑清除量更大,而用侧孔针(第二组)和单斜面针(第三组)冲洗的根管在中部三分之一的平均评分低于冠部和根尖三分之一。所有三种针设计在根管根尖三分之一处的碎屑评分均较高。采用Tukey多重比较检验,显著性水平为P>0.05。与其他针设计组相比,在用带刷Navi Tip FX(第一组)和侧孔(第二组)针冲洗的根管冠部和中部三分之一的碎屑清除方面观察到统计学显著差异(P<0.05)。

结论

在本研究的局限性内,可以得出结论,所有测试的针设计在根管的某些区域有效,但根尖三分之一未清洁。侧孔针通过产生湍流有效地清除了冠部和中部三分之一的碎屑。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验