National Center for Ethics in Health Care, Veterans Health Administration, Washington, DC 20420, USA.
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2006;23(6):483-91. doi: 10.1177/1049909106294883.
Many patients nearing the end of life reach a point at which the goals of care change from an emphasis on prolonging life and optimizing function to maximizing the quality of remaining life, and palliative care becomes a priority. For some patients, however, even high-quality aggressive palliative care fails to provide relief. For patients suffering from severe pain, dyspnea, vomiting, or other symptoms that prove refractory to treatment, there is a consensus that palliative sedation is an appropriate intervention of last resort. In this report, the National Ethics Committee, Veterans Health Administration examines what is meant by palliative sedation, explores ethical concerns about the practice, reviews the emerging professional consensus regarding the use of palliative sedation for managing severe, refractory symptoms at the end of life, and offers specific recommendations for institutional policy.
许多临终患者会达到这样一个阶段,即护理目标从强调延长生命和优化功能转变为最大化剩余生命的质量,姑息治疗成为首要任务。然而,对于一些患者来说,即使是高质量的积极姑息治疗也无法缓解症状。对于患有严重疼痛、呼吸困难、呕吐或其他经治疗后仍难以缓解症状的患者,人们达成共识,姑息性镇静是一种合适的最后手段干预措施。在本报告中,退伍军人健康管理局国家伦理委员会探讨了姑息性镇静的含义,探究了对该做法的伦理担忧,回顾了关于在临终时使用姑息性镇静来管理严重、难治性症状的新出现的专业共识,并为机构政策提供了具体建议。