Raal Ain, Fischer Krista, Irs Alar
Institute of Pharmacy, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2006;42(12):1030-4.
To determine the current sources and perceived needs of drug information among Estonian physicians and pharmacists. METHODS. A survey was conducted among 2000 health care professionals subscribing to a drug information bulletin. The questionnaire addressed the most important areas of drug information for the respondent, the areas of drug information most difficult to access, the main sources of drug information currently used, the quality of information received from the representatives of drug manufacturers, and the need for an independent drug information center (DIC).
A total of 457 (23%) questionnaires were returned. Of all the respondents, 82% were physicians and 18%--pharmacists. More than half of respondents (59%) had over 20 years, 30% had 10-20, and 11% up to 10 years of professional experience. The most important areas of information identified by the respondents were pharmacological action, indications, dosing, and contraindications. The same were considered to be the most difficult areas to find data about. The main sources of drug information were datasheet compendium Pharmaca Estica, specialty handbooks, medical journals, and drug manufacturers' representatives. Manufacturers' representatives provided mainly data about pharmacological action, indications, and dosing (respectively, 66, 64, and 58% of respondents always got this information). Most respondents (89%) considered the information from the manufacturers sufficient; 88% of respondents still considered a drug information center necessary.
The most important areas of drug information (pharmacological action, indications, dosing, and contraindications), the areas difficult to access (medical questions of use in the elderly, drug interactions, use during pregnancy and lactation), the main sources of drug information (Pharmaca Estica, specialty handbooks, medical journals, etc.) and the most favored ways of getting information from the drug information center (by phone, by e-mail) were determined. There were limited differences in the opinions of different professionals and a very high proportion of respondents considered the drug information center necessary.
确定爱沙尼亚医生和药剂师获取药物信息的当前来源及感知到的需求。方法:对订阅药物信息公报的2000名医疗保健专业人员进行了一项调查。问卷涉及受访者认为药物信息最重要的领域、最难获取药物信息的领域、当前使用的药物信息主要来源、从药品制造商代表处获得的信息质量,以及对独立药物信息中心(DIC)的需求。
共收回457份(23%)问卷。在所有受访者中,82%为医生,18%为药剂师。超过一半的受访者(59%)有超过20年的专业经验,30%有10 - 20年,11%有10年及以下专业经验。受访者确定的最重要信息领域为药理作用、适应症、给药剂量和禁忌症。这些也被认为是最难找到相关数据的领域。药物信息的主要来源是《爱沙尼亚药物手册》、专业手册、医学期刊和药品制造商代表。制造商代表主要提供有关药理作用、适应症和给药剂量的数据(分别有66%、64%和58%的受访者总能获得这些信息)。大多数受访者(89%)认为来自制造商的信息足够;88%的受访者仍认为有必要设立一个药物信息中心。
确定了药物信息最重要的领域(药理作用、适应症、给药剂量和禁忌症)、难以获取信息的领域(老年人用药的医学问题、药物相互作用、孕期和哺乳期用药)、药物信息的主要来源(《爱沙尼亚药物手册》、专业手册、医学期刊等)以及从药物信息中心获取信息最受欢迎的方式(通过电话、电子邮件)。不同专业人员的意见差异有限,且绝大多数受访者认为有必要设立药物信息中心。