Suppr超能文献

[永久性心房颤动患者的心脏再同步治疗——是否植入心房电极?]

[Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with permanent atrial fibrillation--with or without atrial lead?].

作者信息

Israel C W

机构信息

J.W. Goethe-Universitätsklinik, Medizinische Klinik III-Kardiologie, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt, Germany.

出版信息

Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol. 2006 Dec;17(4):235-8. doi: 10.1007/s00399-006-0538-5.

Abstract

A 59-year-old patient received a biventricular defibrillator for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) due to severe heart failure and a left bundle branch block. He had suffered from mitral stenosis and had received valve replacement 16 years earlier. Because he had permanent atrial fibrillation since that time, no atrial lead was implanted. His symptoms improved with CRT until he received adequate shock therapy for a rapid ventricular tachyarrhythmia. After that his symptoms deteriorated again severely. The ECG recorded during an unscheduled follow-up visit 1 week after the shock explains the reason.

摘要

一名59岁的患者因严重心力衰竭和左束支传导阻滞接受了双心室除颤器以进行心脏再同步治疗(CRT)。他曾患有二尖瓣狭窄,并在16年前接受了瓣膜置换术。自那时起,他一直患有永久性心房颤动,因此未植入心房电极。接受CRT后他的症状有所改善,直到他因快速室性心律失常接受了适当的电击治疗。此后,他的症状再次严重恶化。电击后1周的一次计划外随访期间记录的心电图解释了原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验