Scott C D, Omar I, McComb J M, Dark J H, Bexton R S
Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1792-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02768.x.
The indications for and timing of permanent pacing were reviewed in all 17 of 154 adult heart transplant recipients at this center who have had permanent pacemakers implanted. Resting 12-lead ECGs recorded during routine follow-up were examined. A prospective study of pacing requirement was then undertaken. Holter monitoring was performed before and after reprogramming the pacemakers to VVI mode at 50 beats/min. Exercise responses in various pacing modes were then assessed in seven patients with rate responsive pacemakers using a standard Bruce protocol treadmill test. The indication for pacing was sinus node dysfunction in 59% (10/17) and atrioventricular (AV) block in 41% (7/17). The majority of pacemakers were implanted between seven and 21 days after transplantation. There was a progressive reduction in the frequency of pacing on 12-lead ECGs with time after transplantation. There was a progressive reduction in the frequency of pacing on 12-lead ECGs with time after transplantation. Eight of 14 patients with empirically selected programming paced during Holter monitoring. After reprogramming to 50 beats/min VVI mode only three of 14 patients, all with sinus node dysfunction, paced. Rate responsive pacing made no difference to exercise time. The requirement for long-term pacing in cardiac transplant recipients is small (3/154) and is limited to patients with sinus node dysfunction. Rate responsive pacing did not increase exercise tolerance.