Suppr超能文献

心脏移植后永久性起搏器植入:保守策略的额外成本

Permanent pacemaker implantation after cardiac transplantation: extra cost of a conservative policy.

作者信息

Holt N D, Parry G, Tynan M M, Dark J H, McComb J M

机构信息

Regional Cardiothoracic Centre, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle upon Tyne.

出版信息

Heart. 1996 Nov;76(5):439-41. doi: 10.1136/hrt.76.5.439.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the costs of a change in permanent pacemaker implantation policy to later implantation (day 21+) after cardiac transplantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective review of patient records including duration of temporary pacing, timed of permanent pacemaker implantation, and length of hospital stay for every patient surviving > or = 14 days from November 1990 to August 1995 (period 2) and for all patients in whom permanent pacemakers were implanted between May 1985 and November 1990 (period 1).

SETTING

Supra-regional cardiopulmonary transplant unit.

PATIENTS

335 consecutive adult cardiac transplant recipients at Freeman Hospital between May 1985 and August 1995.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The cost of the policy change was calculated by subtraction of the overall saving in pacemaker implantations from the overall cost of the extra inpatient stay in period 2 due to delayed implantation.

RESULTS

Mean inpatient stay per patient following cardiac transplantation of permanent pacemaker recipients in period 1 was 13.8 days compared with 23.9 days in period 2 (P < 0.001). The cost of this extended hospital stay is 60,095 pounds. Had the implantation policy not been changed, a further seven patients would have received a permanent pacemaker in period 2. A saving in pacemaker hardware of 16,275 pounds was made. Overall, however, the new permanent pacemaker implantation policy increased expenditure by 43,820 pounds, assuming that permanent pacemaker implantation was the only reason for the extended hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

The change in policy from early to later permanent pacemaker implantation has markedly increased expenditure.

摘要

目的

确定心脏移植后将永久性起搏器植入政策变更为延迟植入(第21天及以后)的成本。

设计

回顾性审查1990年11月至1995年8月存活≥14天的每位患者(第2阶段)以及1985年5月至1990年11月期间植入永久性起搏器的所有患者(第1阶段)的患者记录,包括临时起搏持续时间、永久性起搏器植入时间和住院时间。

地点

超区域心肺移植单位。

患者

1985年5月至1995年8月在弗里曼医院连续接受心脏移植的335名成年患者。

主要观察指标

政策变更的成本通过用第2阶段因延迟植入导致的额外住院总费用减去起搏器植入节省的总费用来计算。

结果

第1阶段永久性起搏器植入患者心脏移植后的平均住院时间为13.8天,而第2阶段为23.9天(P<0.001)。延长住院时间的成本为60,095英镑。如果植入政策没有改变,第2阶段将有另外7名患者接受永久性起搏器植入。起搏器硬件节省了16,275英镑。然而,总体而言,假设永久性起搏器植入是延长住院时间的唯一原因,新的永久性起搏器植入政策使支出增加了43,820英镑。

结论

从早期到延迟植入永久性起搏器的政策变更显著增加了支出。

相似文献

3
Declining need for pacemaker implantation after cardiac transplantation.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1998 Nov;21(11 Pt 2):2350-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1998.tb01180.x.

本文引用的文献

2
Permanent pacing after cardiac transplantation.心脏移植后的永久性起搏
Br Heart J. 1993 May;69(5):399-403. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.5.399.
7
Inhibitors of ANF metabolism. Potential therapeutic agents in cardiovascular disease.
Circulation. 1990 Jul;82(1):313-5. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.82.1.313.
9
Long-term pacing in heart transplant recipients is usually unnecessary.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1991 Nov;14(11 Pt 2):1792-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1991.tb02768.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验