Suppr超能文献

合理配给本质上是局部性的:关于邮政编码处方的争论。

Fair rationing is essentially local: an argument for postcode prescribing.

作者信息

Ashcroft Richard E

机构信息

University of London, Institute of Health Sciences Education, 40 New Road, London El 2AX, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Health Care Anal. 2006 Sep;14(3):135-44. doi: 10.1007/s10728-006-0021-9.

Abstract

In this paper I argue that resource allocation in publicly funded medical systems cannot be done using a purely substantive theory of justice, but must also involve procedural justice. I argue further that procedural justice requires institutions and that these must be "local" in a specific sense which I define. The argument rests on the informational constraints on any non-market method for allocating scarce resources among competing claims of need. However, I resist the identification of this normative account of local justice with the actual approach to local decision-making taken within the UK National Health Service. I illustrate my argument with reference to the case of provision of In Vitro Fertilisation within the UK NHS.

摘要

在本文中,我认为公共资助医疗体系中的资源分配不能仅通过纯粹的实质性正义理论来完成,还必须涉及程序正义。我进一步认为,程序正义需要制度,且这些制度必须在我所定义的特定意义上是“地方性的”。该论点基于对任何非市场方法在相互竞争的需求主张之间分配稀缺资源时的信息约束。然而,我反对将这种关于地方正义的规范性描述与英国国民医疗服务体系(NHS)内部实际的地方决策方法等同起来。我以英国国民医疗服务体系中体外受精服务的提供为例来说明我的论点。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验