• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

稀缺医疗资源分配的伦理:来自中心的观点。

The ethics of allocation of scarce health care resources: a view from the centre.

作者信息

Calman K C

机构信息

Department of Health, London.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 1994 Jun;20(2):71-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.2.71.

DOI:10.1136/jme.20.2.71
PMID:8083876
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1376429/
Abstract

Resource allocation is a central part of the decision-making process in any health care system. Resources have always been finite, thus the ethical issues raised are not new. The debate is now more open, and there is greater public awareness of the issues. It is increasingly recognised that it is the technology which determines resources. The ethical issues involved are often conflicting and relate to issues of individual rights and community benefits. One central feature of resource allocation is the basing of decisions on the outcomes of health care and on their subsequent economic evaluation. The knowledge base is therefore of great importance as is the audit of results of clinical treatment. Public involvement is seen as an integral part of this process. For all parts of the process, better methodologies are required.

摘要

资源分配是任何医疗保健系统决策过程的核心部分。资源一直都是有限的,因此所引发的伦理问题并非新问题。如今,这场辩论更加公开,公众对这些问题的认识也有所提高。人们越来越认识到,是技术决定资源。所涉及的伦理问题往往相互冲突,且与个人权利和社区利益问题相关。资源分配的一个核心特征是决策基于医疗保健的结果及其后续的经济评估。因此,知识库非常重要,临床治疗结果的审核也同样重要。公众参与被视为这一过程不可或缺的一部分。对于该过程的各个环节,都需要更好的方法。

相似文献

1
The ethics of allocation of scarce health care resources: a view from the centre.稀缺医疗资源分配的伦理:来自中心的观点。
J Med Ethics. 1994 Jun;20(2):71-4. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.2.71.
2
The real ethics of rationing.配给制的真正伦理问题。
BMJ. 1997 Jul 12;315(7100):112-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.315.7100.112.
3
Ethical dilemmas for general practitioners under the UK new contract.英国新合同下全科医生面临的伦理困境
J Med Ethics. 1994 Sep;20(3):175-80. doi: 10.1136/jme.20.3.175.
4
Health care allocation, public consultation and the concept of 'health'.医疗保健资源分配、公众咨询与“健康”概念
Health Care Anal. 1998 Sep;6(3):193-8. doi: 10.1007/BF02678104.
5
The rationing agenda in the NHS. Rationing Agenda Group.英国国家医疗服务体系中的配给议程。配给议程小组。
BMJ. 1996 Jun 22;312(7046):1593-601. doi: 10.1136/bmj.312.7046.1593.
6
Public participation and the moral quality of healthcare rationing.公众参与与医疗资源分配的道德品质
Qual Health Care. 1998 Jun;7(2):98-102. doi: 10.1136/qshc.7.2.98.
7
Ethics and the public health.
Med Leg J. 1993;62(Pt. 1):190-203.
8
Economics and ethics in health care.医疗保健中的经济学与伦理学
J Med Ethics. 2001 Aug;27(4):217-22. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.217.
9
The rationing debate. Rationing health care by age.配给制辩论。按年龄配给医疗保健服务。
BMJ. 1997 Mar 15;314(7083):820-5. doi: 10.1136/bmj.314.7083.820.
10
Ethics and geographical equity in health care.医疗保健中的伦理与地域公平性。
J Med Ethics. 2001 Aug;27(4):256-61. doi: 10.1136/jme.27.4.256.

引用本文的文献

1
A roadmap to precision medicine through post-genomic electronic medical records.通过基因组后电子病历实现精准医疗的路线图。
Nat Commun. 2025 Feb 17;16(1):1700. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-56442-4.
2
The challenges and rewards of social prescribing in family medicine.家庭医学中社会处方的挑战与回报。
Front Health Serv. 2024 Oct 14;4:1446397. doi: 10.3389/frhs.2024.1446397. eCollection 2024.
3
Determining the spatial distribution of environmental and socio-economic suitability for human leptospirosis in the face of limited epidemiological data.在有限的流行病学数据下,确定人类钩端螺旋体病的环境和社会经济适宜性的空间分布。
Infect Dis Poverty. 2022 Aug 4;11(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s40249-022-01010-x.
4
Ethical challenges of adult ECMO.成人体外膜肺氧合的伦理挑战。
Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2021 Apr;37(Suppl 2):303-308. doi: 10.1007/s12055-020-00922-3. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
Inequality in distribution of burn facilities in Iran.伊朗烧伤治疗机构分布不均。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Nov 4;33:117. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.117. eCollection 2019.
6
A Systematic Scoping Review of Ethical Issues in Mentoring in Surgery.外科指导中伦理问题的系统综述
J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019 Dec 19;6:2382120519888915. doi: 10.1177/2382120519888915. eCollection 2019 Jan-Dec.
7
Designing and validating a measuring tool for the factors affecting the distribution of hospitals' intensive care beds in Iran.设计并验证一种用于衡量影响伊朗医院重症监护病床分布因素的工具。
Med J Islam Repub Iran. 2019 Aug 5;33:79. doi: 10.34171/mjiri.33.79. eCollection 2019.
8
Association of regional disparity of obstetrics and gynecologic services with children and infants mortality rates: A cross-sectional study.妇产科服务的地区差异与儿童及婴儿死亡率的关联:一项横断面研究。
Int J Reprod Biomed. 2017 Mar;15(3):147-154.
9
How to meet the demand for good quality renal dialysis as part of universal health coverage in resource-limited settings?在资源有限的环境中,如何满足作为全民健康覆盖一部分的优质肾脏透析需求?
Health Res Policy Syst. 2016 Mar 18;14:21. doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0090-7.
10
Distribution of hospital beds in Tehran Province based on Gini coefficient and Lorenz curve from 2010 to 2012.基于基尼系数和洛伦兹曲线的2010年至2012年德黑兰省医院床位分布情况
Electron Physician. 2015 Dec 20;7(8):1653-7. doi: 10.19082/1653. eCollection 2015 Dec.