Levy Paul S, Roth H Daniel, Deubner David C
RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27709-2194, USA.
J Occup Environ Med. 2007 Jan;49(1):96-101. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31802db595.
Our aim was to reanalyze a nested case-control study of beryllium and lung cancer because we identified analysis and study design issues that could have led to the elevated odds ratios obtained in the study.
We reanalyzed the data using nontransformed exposure metrics instead of log-transformed metrics used in the publication. We identified and examined effects on estimated odds ratios of imbalances between cases and controls caused by the control selection method.
This reanalysis found no elevated odds ratios for any exposure variable.
: Our conclusions differ from the authors' interpretation that the findings are due to a causal relationship between beryllium exposure and lung cancer. Our alternative explanation is that they may be due to methodological problems that could have been controlled by closer matching of controls to cases.
This study challenges conclusions made from a large case-control study concerning beryllium-lung cancer associations. Occupational medicine practitioners may want to integrate findings from this study into advice they give beryllium-exposed workers concerned about lung cancer.
我们的目的是重新分析一项关于铍与肺癌的巢式病例对照研究,因为我们发现了一些分析和研究设计问题,这些问题可能导致该研究中获得的优势比升高。
我们使用未转换的暴露指标重新分析数据,而不是使用该出版物中使用的对数转换指标。我们识别并检查了由对照选择方法导致的病例与对照之间失衡对估计优势比的影响。
此次重新分析未发现任何暴露变量的优势比升高。
我们的结论与作者的解释不同,作者认为这些发现是由于铍暴露与肺癌之间的因果关系。我们的另一种解释是,它们可能是由于方法学问题导致的,而这些问题可以通过使对照与病例更紧密匹配来控制。
本研究对一项关于铍与肺癌关联的大型病例对照研究得出的结论提出了挑战。职业医学从业者可能希望将本研究的结果纳入他们给担心患肺癌的铍暴露工人的建议中。