Suppr超能文献

双束与单束前交叉韧带重建:一项前瞻性随机临床研究。

Double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective, randomize clinical study.

作者信息

Järvelä Timo

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Hatanpää Hospital, Tampere, Finland.

出版信息

Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2007 May;15(5):500-7. doi: 10.1007/s00167-006-0254-z. Epub 2007 Jan 10.

Abstract

Anatomical observation and biomechanical studies have shown that the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) mainly consists of two distinct bundles, the anteromedial (AM) bundle and posterolateral (PL) bundle. Conventional single-bundle ACL reconstruction techniques have focused on the restoration of the AM bundle while giving limited attention to the PL bundle. The purpose of this prospective, randomized clinical study is to compare the outcomes of ACL reconstruction when using either double-bundle or single-bundle technique and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation, and similar rehabilitation with both techniques. Sixty-five patients were randomized into either double-bundle (n = 35) or single-bundle (n = 30) ACL reconstruction with hamstring tendons and bioabsorbable screw (Hexalon, Inion Company, Tampere, Finland) fixation in both groups. The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometer measurements, radiographic evaluation, as well as International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores. There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. For an average of 14 months of follow-up (range 12-20 months), 30 patients of the double-bundle group and 29 patients of the single-bundle group were available (91%). At the follow-up, the rotational stability, as evaluated by pivot shift test, was significantly better in the double-bundle group than in the single-bundle group. However, in anterior stability of the knee, there was no significant difference between the groups. None of the patients in the double-bundle group had graft failure, while four patients in the single-bundle group had. In addition, knee scores were equal at the follow-up, and all the results were significantly better at the follow-up than preoperatively, in both groups.

摘要

解剖学观察和生物力学研究表明,前交叉韧带(ACL)主要由两个不同的束组成,即前内侧(AM)束和后外侧(PL)束。传统的单束ACL重建技术主要关注AM束的恢复,而对PL束的关注有限。这项前瞻性随机临床研究的目的是比较使用双束或单束技术以及生物可吸收干涉螺钉固定进行ACL重建的结果,以及两种技术相似的康复情况。65例患者被随机分为双束(n = 35)或单束(n = 30)ACL重建组,两组均采用腘绳肌腱和生物可吸收螺钉(Hexalon,Inion公司,芬兰坦佩雷)固定。评估方法包括临床检查、KT-1000关节测量仪测量、影像学评估,以及国际膝关节文献委员会和Lysholm膝关节评分。研究组术前无差异。平均随访14个月(范围12 - 20个月),双束组有30例患者、单束组有29例患者可供评估(91%)。随访时,通过轴移试验评估,双束组的旋转稳定性明显优于单束组。然而,在膝关节的前向稳定性方面,两组之间没有显著差异。双束组没有患者出现移植物失败,而单束组有4例患者出现。此外,随访时膝关节评分相等,两组所有结果在随访时均明显优于术前。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验