Järvelä Timo, Moisala Anna-Stina, Sihvonen Raine, Järvelä Sally, Kannus Pekka, Järvinen Markku
Orthopaedic Departmentand Arthroscopic Center, Hatanpää Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Am J Sports Med. 2008 Feb;36(2):290-7. doi: 10.1177/0363546507308360. Epub 2007 Oct 16.
Conventional anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques have focused on restoration of the anteromedial bundle only, which, however, may be insufficient in restoring the rotational stability of the knee.
Rotational stability of the knee is better when using a double-bundle technique instead of a single-bundle technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
Randomized controlled clinical trial; Level of evidence, 1.
Seventy-seven patients were randomized into 3 different groups for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with hamstring tendons: double-bundle with bioabsorbable screw fixation (n = 25), single-bundle with bioabsorbable screw fixation (n = 27), and single-bundle with metallic screw fixation (n = 25). The evaluation methods were clinical examination, KT-1000 arthrometric measurement, and the International Knee Documentation Committee and Lysholm knee scores.
There were no differences between the study groups preoperatively. Seventy-three patients (95%) were available at a minimum 2-year follow-up (range, 24-35 mo). The rotational stability of the knee, as evaluated by the pivot-shift test, was the best in the patients in the double-bundle group. In addition, the patients in the single-bundle groups had more graft failures than those in the double-bundle group. Concerning the anterior stability of the knee as measured with the KT-1000 arthrometer, the group differences were not statistically significant. No significant differences were found between the groups in knee scores.
Rotational stability of the knee is better when using the double-bundle technique instead of the single-bundle technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
传统的前交叉韧带重建技术仅专注于恢复前内侧束,然而,这可能不足以恢复膝关节的旋转稳定性。
在前交叉韧带重建中,使用双束技术比单束技术能更好地恢复膝关节的旋转稳定性。
随机对照临床试验;证据等级,1级。
77例患者被随机分为3组,采用腘绳肌腱进行前交叉韧带重建:双束生物可吸收螺钉固定组(n = 25)、单束生物可吸收螺钉固定组(n = 27)和单束金属螺钉固定组(n = 25)。评估方法包括临床检查、KT-1000关节测量仪测量以及国际膝关节文献委员会和Lysholm膝关节评分。
术前各研究组之间无差异。73例患者(95%)获得了至少2年的随访(范围,24 - 35个月)。通过轴移试验评估,双束组患者膝关节的旋转稳定性最佳。此外,单束组的移植物失败率高于双束组。关于使用KT-1000关节测量仪测量的膝关节前向稳定性,组间差异无统计学意义。各小组的膝关节评分无显著差异。
在前交叉韧带重建中,使用双束技术比单束技术能更好地恢复膝关节的旋转稳定性。