Silva H T, Yang H C, Abouljoud M, Kuo P C, Wisemandle K, Bhattacharya P, Dhadda S, Holman J, Fitzsimmons W, First M Roy
Hospital do Rim E Hipertansã, São Paulo, Brazil.
Am J Transplant. 2007 Mar;7(3):595-608. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01661.x. Epub 2007 Jan 11.
Once-daily tacrolimus extended-release formulation (Prograf XL, formerly referred to as MR or MR4) was compared with the twice-a-day tacrolimus formulation (TAC) and cyclosporine microemulsion (CsA), all administered in combination with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, in a phase 3, randomized (1:1:1), open-label trial in 638 de novo kidney transplant recipients. In combination with MMF and corticosteroids, XL had an efficacy profile comparable to TAC and CsA. XL/MMF and TAC/MMF were statistically noninferior at 1-year posttransplantation to CsA/MMF for the primary efficacy endpoint, efficacy failure (death, graft loss, biopsy-confirmed acute rejection (BCAR) or lost to follow-up). One-year patient and graft survival were 98.6% and 96.7% in the XL/MMF group, 95.7% and 92.9% in TAC/MMF group and 97.6% and 95.7% in CsA/MMF group. The safety profile of XL in comparison with CsA was similar to that observed with TAC in this study and consistent with previously published reports of TAC in comparison with CsA. The results support the safety and efficacy of tacrolimus in combination with MMF, corticosteroids and basiliximab induction, as well as XL as a safe and effective once-daily dosing alternative.
在一项针对638例初发肾移植受者的3期随机(1:1:1)开放标签试验中,对每日一次的他克莫司缓释制剂(普乐可复XL,原称为MR或MR4)与每日两次的他克莫司制剂(TAC)及环孢素微乳剂(CsA)进行了比较,所有药物均与霉酚酸酯(MMF)、皮质类固醇和巴利昔单抗诱导剂联合使用。与MMF和皮质类固醇联合使用时,XL的疗效与TAC和CsA相当。对于主要疗效终点即疗效失败(死亡、移植物丢失、活检证实的急性排斥反应(BCAR)或失访),XL/MMF和TAC/MMF在移植后1年时与CsA/MMF相比在统计学上非劣效。XL/MMF组1年时的患者和移植物存活率分别为98.6%和96.7%,TAC/MMF组为95.7%和92.9%,CsA/MMF组为97.6%和95.7%。与CsA相比,XL的安全性与本研究中观察到的TAC相似,且与先前发表的TAC与CsA比较的报告一致。这些结果支持了他克莫司与MMF、皮质类固醇和巴利昔单抗诱导剂联合使用的安全性和有效性,以及XL作为一种安全有效的每日一次给药替代方案的安全性和有效性。