Betteridge A, Craven R P
School of Biological and Molecular Sciences, Oxford Polytechnic Headington, United Kingdom.
Biol Reprod. 1991 Nov;45(5):748-54. doi: 10.1095/biolreprod45.5.748.
The investigation of the role of inhibin in the regulation of fertility is hindered by the lack of a routine, specific assay. The pituitary cell bioassay is time-consuming and the existing RIAs, based on either purified bovine 32-kDa inhibin or synthetic alpha-subunit peptides, are not specific for the biologically active inhibin molecules. We have used monoclonal antibodies, one specific for the N-terminal region of the human inhibin alpha chain, and the other raised to a peptide sequence close to the C-terminal of the human beta A-inhibin chain, to create a two-site sandwich ELISA specific for alpha beta-inhibin molecules. This was used to estimate levels of inhibin in crude bovine and human follicular fluids and fractions concentrated from them. Comparison of the values obtained with the ELISA and those obtained with the pituitary cell bioassay, suggests that the ELISA measures biologically active inhibin. Compared with the peptide-based RIA, the ELISA gave much lower (as little as 100-fold lower) values for the inhibin content of these samples, e.g., bovine follicular fluid 0.375 micrograms/ml (ELISA) compared with 41.0 micrograms/ml (RIA). Such large differences, possibly due to the presence of relatively large amounts of biologically inactive forms of inhibin such as the pro-alpha c or free alpha forms, suggest that those RIAs, which essentially measure the level of alpha-inhibin, considerably overestimate the levels of the active forms of inhibin in the samples and that results obtained using these assays may need reinterpretation.
由于缺乏常规的特异性检测方法,抑制素在生育调节中作用的研究受到了阻碍。垂体细胞生物检测耗时较长,而现有的放射免疫分析(RIA),无论是基于纯化的牛32 kDa抑制素还是合成的α亚基肽,都对生物活性抑制素分子缺乏特异性。我们使用了单克隆抗体,一种对人抑制素α链的N端区域具有特异性,另一种针对与人βA -抑制素链C端附近的肽序列产生,以创建一种针对αβ -抑制素分子的双位点夹心酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)。该方法用于估计粗制牛和人卵泡液及其浓缩组分中抑制素的水平。ELISA获得的值与垂体细胞生物检测获得的值的比较表明,ELISA检测的是生物活性抑制素。与基于肽的RIA相比,ELISA测得的这些样品中抑制素含量的值要低得多(低至100倍),例如,牛卵泡液为0.375微克/毫升(ELISA),而RIA测得的值为41.0微克/毫升。如此大的差异,可能是由于存在相对大量的生物无活性形式的抑制素,如前αc或游离α形式,这表明那些基本上测量α -抑制素水平的RIA大大高估了样品中活性形式抑制素的水平,并且使用这些检测方法获得的结果可能需要重新解释。