Suppr超能文献

肌腱修复后冈上肌腱的应力分布:缝线锚钉与骨内缝线固定的比较

Stress distribution in the supraspinatus tendon after tendon repair: suture anchors versus transosseous suture fixation.

作者信息

Sano Hirotaka, Yamashita Takeshi, Wakabayashi Ikuko, Itoi Eiji

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Tohoku University School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Am J Sports Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):542-6. doi: 10.1177/0363546506296310. Epub 2007 Jan 11.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The stress concentration at the site of supraspinatus tendon repair, either by suture anchor fixation or by transosseous suture fixation, has not been fully clarified.

HYPOTHESIS

Suture anchor fixation showed higher stress concentrations in the tendon than did transosseous suture fixation.

STUDY DESIGN

Controlled laboratory study.

METHODS

Three finite element models were developed based on a previously published model of normal supraspinatus tendon (0 degrees abduction). Single-row fixation, double-row fixation, and transosseous suture fixation were simulated. A tensile force was applied to the proximal end of the supraspinatus tendon to simulate its contraction force.

RESULTS

In the single-row model, the stress appeared from the site of the anchor and extended into the proximal tendon. The highest stress concentration was observed on the bursal surface of the tendon. The double-row model showed a similar pattern to the single-row model except that the stress concentration was observed only around the medial anchor. In the transosseous model, the stress appeared from the attachment site to a bony trough, which extended proximally into the tendon substance. No significant stress concentration was observed inside the tendon.

CONCLUSION

Both single-row and double-row fixations showed higher stress concentration inside the tendon than did transosseous suture fixation.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

A high stress concentration might be a cause of the rerupture often observed after arthroscopic cuff repair using suture anchors.

摘要

背景

无论是采用缝合锚钉固定还是经骨缝合固定,肩袖肌腱修复部位的应力集中情况尚未完全明确。

假设

与经骨缝合固定相比,缝合锚钉固定在肌腱中显示出更高的应力集中。

研究设计

对照实验室研究。

方法

基于先前发表的正常肩袖肌腱(外展0度)模型开发了三个有限元模型。模拟了单排固定、双排固定和经骨缝合固定。在肩袖肌腱近端施加拉力以模拟其收缩力。

结果

在单排模型中,应力从锚钉部位出现并延伸至近端肌腱。在肌腱的滑囊表面观察到最高应力集中。双排模型显示出与单排模型相似的模式,只是应力集中仅在内侧锚钉周围观察到。在经骨模型中,应力从附着部位延伸至骨槽,向近端延伸至肌腱实质内。在肌腱内部未观察到明显的应力集中。

结论

与经骨缝合固定相比,单排和双排固定在肌腱内部均显示出更高的应力集中。

临床意义

高应力集中可能是使用缝合锚钉进行关节镜下肩袖修复后经常观察到再断裂的原因。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验