Cannesson Maxime, Tanabe Masaki, Suffoletto Matthew S, McNamara Dennis M, Madan Shobhit, Lacomis Joan M, Gorcsan John
Cardiovascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-2582, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 16;49(2):217-26. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.08.045. Epub 2006 Dec 29.
We sought to test the hypothesis that a novel 2-dimensional echocardiographic image analysis system using artificial intelligence-learned pattern recognition can rapidly and reproducibly calculate ejection fraction (EF).
Echocardiographic EF by manual tracing is time consuming, and visual assessment is inherently subjective.
We studied 218 patients (72 female), including 165 with abnormal left ventricular (LV) function. Auto EF incorporated a database trained on >10,000 human EF tracings to automatically locate and track the LV endocardium from routine grayscale digital cineloops and calculate EF in 15 s. Auto EF results were independently compared with manually traced biplane Simpson's rule, visual EF, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a subset.
Auto EF was possible in 200 (92%) of consecutive patients, of which 77% were completely automated and 23% required manual editing. Auto EF correlated well with manual EF (r = 0.98; 6% limits of agreement) and required less time per patient (48 +/- 26 s vs. 102 +/- 21 s; p < 0.01). Auto EF correlated well with visual EF by expert readers (r = 0.96; p < 0.001), but interobserver variability was greater (3.4 +/- 2.9% vs. 9.8 +/- 5.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Visual EF was less accurate by novice readers (r = 0.82; 19% limits of agreement) and improved with trainee-operated Auto EF (r = 0.96; 7% limits of agreement). Auto EF also correlated with MRI EF (n = 21) (r = 0.95; 12% limits of agreement), but underestimated absolute volumes (r = 0.95; bias of -36 +/- 27 ml overall).
Auto EF can automatically calculate EF similarly to results by manual biplane Simpson's rule and MRI, with less variability than visual EF, and has clinical potential.
我们试图验证一个假设,即使用人工智能学习模式识别的新型二维超声心动图图像分析系统能够快速且可重复地计算射血分数(EF)。
通过手动描记来测定超声心动图EF耗时,且视觉评估本质上具有主观性。
我们研究了218例患者(72例女性),其中165例左心室(LV)功能异常。自动EF纳入了一个基于超过10000份人类EF描记训练的数据库,以从常规灰度数字电影环中自动定位和追踪LV心内膜,并在15秒内计算EF。在一个亚组中,将自动EF的结果与手动双平面辛普森法则、视觉EF以及磁共振成像(MRI)的结果进行独立比较。
在连续的200例(92%)患者中可以进行自动EF计算,其中77%完全自动化,23%需要人工编辑。自动EF与手动EF相关性良好(r = 0.98;一致性界限为6%),且每位患者所需时间更少(48±26秒对102±21秒;p < 0.01)。自动EF与专家读者的视觉EF相关性良好(r = 0.96;p < 0.001),但观察者间变异性更大(分别为3.4±2.9%对9.8±5.7%;p < 0.001)。新手读者的视觉EF准确性较低(r = 0.82;一致性界限为19%),而在实习医生操作的自动EF辅助下有所提高(r = 0.96;一致性界限为7%)。自动EF也与MRI的EF相关(n = 21)(r = 0.95;一致性界限为12%),但低估了绝对容积(r = 0.95;总体偏差为 -36±27 ml)。
自动EF能够像手动双平面辛普森法则和MRI那样自动计算EF,变异性小于视觉EF,具有临床应用潜力。