Suppr超能文献

根据美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会指南建议进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的风险调整死亡率分析。

Risk-adjusted mortality analysis of percutaneous coronary interventions by American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommendations.

作者信息

Anderson H Vernon, Shaw Richard E, Brindis Ralph G, McKay Charles R, Klein Lloyd W, Krone Ronald J, Ho Kalon K L, Rumsfeld John S, Smith Sidney C, Weintraub William S

机构信息

University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, Texas, USA.

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 2007 Jan 15;99(2):189-96. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2006.07.083. Epub 2006 Nov 16.

Abstract

An American College of Cardiology (ACC)/American Heart Association (AHA) task force on practice guidelines in 2001 published evidence-based recommendations for performing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). These guidelines grouped the indications for PCI into 4 classes (I, IIa, IIb, and III) based on analyses of risks and benefits. In a previous study, we found that clinical success and in-hospital adverse events varied by indications class. However, no adjustment for risk was used in those comparisons. The ACC/National Cardiovascular Data Registry (ACC-NCDR) previously developed a risk-adjustment model for the adverse event of in-hospital PCI mortality. We investigated how the 14 individual risk factors in the ACC-NCDR PCI mortality model might differ across the 4 indications classes and whether estimated mortality for each class approximated the observed mortality for that class. We analyzed the ACC-NCDR PCI database for January 1, 2001 to December 31, 2004. We excluded procedures performed for treatment of acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; all others were included, yielding 559,273 procedures for analysis. An algorithm derived from the 2001 guidelines was used to assign procedures to an indications class. Increasing frequencies of risk components were observed across classes I, IIa, IIb, and III. Expected mortalities for each class calculated by the risk-adjustment model were close to observed values (expected 0.52%, 0.59%, 1.72%, and 1.96%, respectively; observed 0.49%, 0.63%, 1.88%, and 1.60%, respectively). In conclusion, the ACC-NCDR risk-adjusted mortality model can be linked to the ACC/AHA PCI guidelines, and together these produce mortality risk estimates by indications classes that are close to actual observed values. With further refinement, these methods should be able to be used as powerful analytic tools for quality assurance and appropriateness purposes.

摘要

2001年,美国心脏病学会(ACC)/美国心脏协会(AHA)实践指南特别工作组发布了关于进行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的循证建议。这些指南基于对风险和益处的分析,将PCI的适应证分为4类(I、IIa、IIb和III)。在之前的一项研究中,我们发现临床成功率和院内不良事件因适应证类别而异。然而,在这些比较中未进行风险调整。ACC/国家心血管数据注册库(ACC-NCDR)此前开发了一种用于院内PCI死亡不良事件的风险调整模型。我们研究了ACC-NCDR PCI死亡模型中的14个个体风险因素在4个适应证类别中可能存在的差异,以及每个类别的估计死亡率是否接近该类别的观察死亡率。我们分析了2001年1月1日至2004年12月31日的ACC-NCDR PCI数据库。我们排除了用于治疗急性ST段抬高型心肌梗死的手术;纳入了所有其他手术,共得到559,273例用于分析的手术。采用源自2001年指南的算法将手术分配到适应证类别。在I、IIa、IIb和III类中观察到风险因素的频率逐渐增加。风险调整模型计算出的每个类别的预期死亡率接近观察值(预期分别为0.52%、0.59%、1.72%和1.96%;观察值分别为0.49%、0.63%、1.88%和1.60%)。总之,ACC-NCDR风险调整死亡率模型可与ACC/AHA PCI指南相关联,二者共同得出按适应证类别划分的死亡率风险估计值,这些估计值接近实际观察值。经过进一步完善,这些方法应能够用作质量保证和适用性评估的有力分析工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验